Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35468266›Full record

Trial reportArthritis care & research2022

Cost-Effectiveness of Group-Based Outpatient Physical Therapy After Total Knee Replacement: Results From the Economic Evaluation Alongside the ARENA Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Estela C Barbosa, Vikki Wylde, Joanna Thorn, Emily Sanderson, Erik Lenguerrand, Neil Artz, Ashley W Blom, Elsa M R Marques

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis care & research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. On spillovers in economic evaluations: definition, mapping review and research agenda.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Estela C BarbosaUniversity of Bristol, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Vikki WyldeUniversity of Bristol, Bristol Medical School and NIHR Bristol Medical Research Centre, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8460-1529
Joanna ThornUniversity of Bristol, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Emily SandersonUniversity of Bristol, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Erik LenguerrandUniversity of Bristol, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Neil ArtzUniversity of Gloucestershire, Gloucester, UK.
Ashley W BlomUniversity of Bristol, Bristol Medical School and NIHR Bristol Medical Research Centre, Bristol, UK.
Elsa M R MarquesUniversity of Bristol, Bristol Medical School and NIHR Bristol Medical Research Centre, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1360-5677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of a group-based outpatient physical therapy intervention delivered 6 weeks after primary total knee replacement (TKR) compared with usual care, alongside the Activity-Orientated Rehabilitation Following Knee Arthroplasty (ARENA) multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.

methodsThe economic analyses were performed from the perspective of the health and social care payer. We collected resource use for health and social care and productivity losses and patient outcomes for 12 months after surgery to derive costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Results were expressed in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and incremental net monetary benefit statistics (INMBs) for a society willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained, with sensitivity analyses to model specification and perspective.

resultsThe cost of the ARENA physical therapy classes was mean ± SD £179 ± 39 per patient. Treatment in the year following surgery cost was, on average, £1,739 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] -£742, £4,221) per patient in the intervention group (n = 89), which was an additional £346 (95% CI £38, £653) per patient compared with usual care (n = 91) (£1,393 [95% CI -£780, £3,568]). QALY benefits were 0.0506 higher (95% CI 0.009, 0.09) in the intervention group, corresponding to an additional 19 days in "perfect health." The ICER for the intervention group was £6,842 per QALY gained, and the INMB was £665 (95% CI £139, £1,191), with a 92% probability of being cost-effective, and no less than 73% in all sensitivity analysis scenarios.

conclusionThe addition of group-based outpatient physical therapy classes to usual care improves quality of life and is a cost-effective treatment option following TKR for a society WTP threshold of £20,000 per QALY gained.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansOutpatientsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID35468266
PMCPMC10087974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.