ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022
Tracking of rigid head motion during MRI using an EEG system.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intra-MRI Head Motion Tracking and Correction: A Quantitative In Vivo Evaluation Framework.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Autonomy for MRI Field Cameras: Synchronization, Self-Calibration, and Sequence Detection.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Sequence-agnostic motion-correction leveraging efficiently calibrated Pilot Tone signals.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Motion Artifact Reduction Using U-Net Model with Three-Dimensional Simulation-Based Datasets for Brain Magnetic Resonance Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Quantifying MR head motion in the Rhineland Study - A robust method for population cohorts.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Advances in differential diagnosis of cerebrovascular diseases in magnetic resonance imaging: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Review
- The MotoNet: A 3 Tesla MRI-Conditional EEG Net with Embedded Motion Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- External Hardware and Sensors, for Improved MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Review
- Tracking of rigid head motion during MRI using an EEG system.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo demonstrate a novel method for tracking of head movements during MRI using electroencephalography (EEG) hardware for recording signals induced by native imaging gradients. THEORY AND
methodsGradient switching during simultaneous EEG-fMRI induces distortions in EEG signals, which depend on subject head position and orientation. When EEG electrodes are interconnected with high-impedance carbon wire loops, the induced voltages are linear combinations of the temporal gradient waveform derivatives. We introduce head tracking based on these signals (CapTrack) involving 3 steps: (1) phantom scanning is used to characterize the target sequence and a fast calibration sequence; (2) a linear relation between changes of induced signals and head pose is established using the calibration sequence; and (3) induced signals recorded during target sequence scanning are used for tracking and retrospective correction of head movement without prolonging the scan time of the target sequence. Performance of CapTrack is compared directly to interleaved navigators.
resultsHead-pose tracking at 27.5 Hz during echo planar imaging (EPI) was demonstrated with close resemblance to rigid body alignment (mean absolute difference: [0.14 0.38 0.15]-mm translation, [0.30 0.27 0.22]-degree rotation). Retrospective correction of 3D gradient-echo imaging shows an increase of average edge strength of 12%/-0.39% for instructed/uninstructed motion with CapTrack pose estimates, with a tracking interval of 1561 ms and high similarity to interleaved navigator estimates (mean absolute difference: [0.13 0.33 0.12] mm, [0.28 0.15 0.22] degrees).
conclusionMotion can be estimated from recordings of gradient switching with little or no sequence modification, optionally in real time at low computational burden and synchronized to image acquisition, using EEG equipment already found at many research institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.