Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35468228›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2022

Quantifying the ossification and fusion of the calcaneal apophysis using computed tomography.

Connor S Blythe, Mikaela S Reynolds, Laura S Gregory

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Apophyseal injuries in soccer players.Skeletal radiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Normal Development and Variants in Pediatric Bone].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Connor S BlytheClinical Anatomy and Paediatric Imaging Research Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3244-2762
Mikaela S ReynoldsClinical Anatomy and Paediatric Imaging Research Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Laura S GregoryClinical Anatomy and Paediatric Imaging Research Laboratory, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

Queensland University of Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of the anatomical development of the calcaneal apophysis is essential in clinical assessment and management of both paediatric and sub-adult patients presenting with heel pain. Despite this, the current understanding of calcaneal apophyseal development is constrained by the limitations of the imaging modalities used to examine the apophysis, with no current literature reporting the development of the medial and lateral processes. This study aimed to overcome these limitations by investigating the ossification and fusion of the calcaneal apophysis using three-dimensional computed tomography analysis, and statistically predicting the apophyseal developmental stage in contemporary Australian children. The development and fusion status of the apophysis was scored using a novel 11-stage scoring system on 568 multi-slice computed tomography scans (295 females; 274 males) and 266 lateral radiographic scans (119 females; 147 males) from the Queensland Children's Hospital. Multinomial logistic regression along with classification tables and predictive probabilities were then utilised to assess developmental stage likelihood from known age and sex. The apophysis commenced ossification at a mean age of 5.2 years for females and 7.2 years for males, and then elongated to form the apophyseal cap around 10 years for females and 12.4 years for males. Fusion of the apophysis commenced at a mean age of 11.18 years for females and 13.3 years for males, with the earliest age of complete fusion observed at 10 years for females and 14 years for males. The results demonstrate significant sexual dimorphism in ossification and fusion with females developing and fusing significantly earlier. Furthermore, the use of computed tomography in this study allowed for the first time evaluation of the ossification and fusion of the medial and lateral processes of the calcaneus. The medial process formed at a mean age of 9.5 years for females and 10.9 years for males while the lateral process formed at around 9.8 years for females and 11.7 years for males. The medial process demonstrated slower rates of fusion compared to the lateral process. The present study provides Queensland specific standards for assessing the calcaneal apophyseal developmental stage as well as novel predictive regression models for apophyseal stage estimation using known age and sex to aid in the diagnosis of heel pain conditions such as apophysitis or screen for developmental delays in children and subadults.

Indexed as

Age Determination by SkeletonCalcaneusAdultAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleOsteogenesisPainTomography, X-Ray Computedcalcaneal apophysiscomputed tomographygrowth and developmentlogistic regressionossificationpredictive modelling

Identifiers

PMID35468228
PMCPMC9296023
OpenAlexW4224859687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.