Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35468001›Full record

ArticleStroke2022

Perceptual Disorders After Stroke: A Scoping Review of Interventions.

Christine Hazelton, Kris McGill, Pauline Campbell, Alex Todhunter-Brown, Katie Thomson, Donald J Nicolson, Joshua D Cheyne, Charlie Chung, Liam Dorris, David C Gillespie and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Optimizing Cross-Modal Matching for Multimodal Motor Rehabilitation.IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings] · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Christine HazeltonNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, United Kingdom (C.H., K.M., P.C., A.T.-B., K.T., M.C.B.).ORCID 0000-0002-9554-4750
Kris McGillNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, United Kingdom (C.H., K.M., P.C., A.T.-B., K.T., M.C.B.).ORCID 0000-0002-0307-1440
Pauline CampbellNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, United Kingdom (C.H., K.M., P.C., A.T.-B., K.T., M.C.B.).ORCID 0000-0002-5879-5526
Alex Todhunter-BrownNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, United Kingdom (C.H., K.M., P.C., A.T.-B., K.T., M.C.B.).ORCID 0000-0003-4941-7985
Katie ThomsonNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, United Kingdom (C.H., K.M., P.C., A.T.-B., K.T., M.C.B.).ORCID 0000-0002-2558-2559
Donald J NicolsonStroke Survivor Representative, United Kingdom (D.J.N.).ORCID 0000-0003-4190-6434
Joshua D CheyneCochrane Stroke Group, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom (J.D.C.).
Charlie ChungQueen Margaret Hospital, National Health Service (NHS) Fife, United Kingdom (C.C.).ORCID 0000-0003-0280-7935
Liam DorrisPaediatric Neurosciences, Royal Hospital for Children, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, United Kingdom (L.D.).ORCID 0000-0002-9502-3154
David C GillespieDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, United Kingdom (D.C.G.).ORCID 0000-0003-1325-9727
Susan M HunterSchool of Allied Health Professions, Keele University, United Kingdom (S.M.H.).ORCID 0000-0001-8844-6848
Marian C BradyNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, United Kingdom (C.H., K.M., P.C., A.T.-B., K.T., M.C.B.).ORCID 0000-0002-4589-7021
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBCochrane · GBHouse of Representatives · NLKeele University · GBNHS Lothian · GBQueen Margaret Hospital · GBRoyal Hospital for Children · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perceptual disorders relating to hearing, smell, somatosensation, taste, touch, and vision commonly impair stroke survivors' ability to interpret sensory information, impacting on their ability to interact with the world. We aimed to identify and summarize the existing evidence for perceptual disorder interventions poststroke and identify evidence gaps. We searched 13 electronic databases including MEDLINE and Embase and Grey literature and performed citation tracking. Two authors independently applied a priori-defined selection criteria; studies involving stroke survivors with perceptual impairments and interventions addressing those impairments were included. We extracted data on study design, population, perceptual disorders, interventions, and outcomes. Data were tabulated and synthesized narratively. Stroke survivors, carers, and clinicians were involved in agreeing definitions and organizing and interpreting data. From 91 869 records, 80 studies were identified (888 adults and 5 children); participant numbers were small (median, 3.5; range, 1-80), with a broad range of stroke types and time points. Primarily focused on vision (34/80, 42.5%) and somatosensation (28/80; 35.0%), included studies were often case reports (36/80; 45.0%) or randomized controlled trials (22/80; 27.5%). Rehabilitation approaches (78/93; 83.9%), primarily aimed to restore function, and were delivered by clinicians (30/78; 38.5%) or technology (28/78; 35.9%; including robotic interventions for somatosensory disorders). Pharmacological (6/93; 6.5%) and noninvasive brain stimulation (7/93; 7.5%) approaches were also evident. Intervention delivery was poorly reported, but most were delivered in hospital settings (56/93; 60.2%). Study outcomes failed to assess the transfer of training to daily life. Interventions for stroke-related perceptual disorders are underresearched, particularly for pediatric populations. Evidence gaps include interventions for disorders of hearing, taste, touch, and smell perception. Future studies must involve key stakeholders and report this fully. Optimization of intervention design, evaluation, and reporting is required, to support the development of effective, acceptable, and implementable interventions. Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; Unique identifier: CRD42019160270.

Indexed as

Perceptual DisordersStrokeStroke RehabilitationAdultCaregiversChildHumansSurvivorsauditory perceptionperceptual disorderreviewsomatosensory disordersstroketouch perceptionvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID35468001
PMCPMC9022686
OpenAlexW4224434664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.