Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35467794›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2022

Development of Pulmonary Hypertension in Over One-Third of Patients With Th/To Antibody-Positive Scleroderma in Long-Term Follow-Up.

Shashank Suresh, Devon Charlton, Erin K Snell, Maureen Laffoon, Thomas A Medsger, Lei Zhu, Robyn T Domsic

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Advanced Autoantibody Testing in Systemic Sclerosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Systemic sclerosis.Lancet (London, England) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shashank SureshUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-5429-8899
Devon CharltonUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Erin K SnellNorthwest Permanente, Portland, Oregon.
Maureen LaffoonUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Thomas A MedsgerUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Lei ZhuUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Robyn T DomsicUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-2765-0922
University of Pittsburgh · USEducation Northwest · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational studies for identifying and targeting novel pathways in systemic sclerosis pathogenesisP50AR060780 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LAFYATIS, ROBERT A. · 2011 to 2021
$14.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS P50 AR060780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was undertaken to describe clinical manifestations in patients with Th/To antibody-positive systemic sclerosis (SSc) during long-term follow-up.

methodsWe performed a case-control study involving anti-Th/To antibody-positive patients with SSc who were newly referred to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and the Pittsburgh Scleroderma Center from 1980 to 2015. For every case, 2 anti-Th/To antibody-negative SSc patients (the first 2 consecutively seen after a case) were used as controls. Long-term disease manifestations and survival were then compared between cases and controls.

resultsA total of 204 anti-Th/To antibody-positive SSc patients and 408 controls were identified. The cohort had a mean ± SD age of 52 ± 12.9 years, and 76% of individuals were women. Anti-Th/To antibody-positive patients more often presented without skin thickening (P < 0.0001) and had a higher rate of pulmonary hypertension (PH) (P < 0.0001) and interstitial lung disease (P = 0.05) compared to anti-Th/To antibody-negative SSc controls. Anti-Th/To antibody-positive SSc patients also had less frequent muscle and joint involvement than anti-Th/To antibody-negative SSc controls (P < 0.0001). After a median clinical follow-up period of 6.1 years (interquartile range 2.4-12.7), 38% of anti-Th/To-positive patients had developed PH compared to 15% of anti-Th/To antibody-negative SSc controls (P < 0.0001). The rate of PH classified as World Health Organization (WHO) Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension [PAH] was 23% in anti-Th/To-positive patients compared to 9% in anti-Th/To antibody-negative SSc controls (P < 0.0001). After adjusting for age and sex, anti-Th/To antibody positivity was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.3 (95% confidence interval 2.3-4.9) for increased risk of developing PH at 10 years of follow-up from the first scleroderma center visit.

conclusionThis is the largest cohort of patients with anti-Th/To antibody-positive SSc with long-term follow-up data. The very high rate (38%) and associated independent risk of anti-Th/To antibody-positive patients developing PH in follow-up, particularly in WHO Group 1 PAH patients, is striking. Patients presenting with limited skin involvement should be tested for Th/To antibodies, and if present, careful monitoring for PH is warranted.

Indexed as

Hypertension, PulmonaryLung Diseases, InterstitialScleroderma, LocalizedScleroderma, SystemicAdultCase-Control StudiesFamilial Primary Pulmonary HypertensionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID35467794
PMCPMC9477491
OpenAlexW4224438154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.