Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35467752›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2022

Maternal beta-blocker dose and risk of small-for gestational-age in women with heart disease.

Ingvil Krarup Sørbye, Randi Haualand, Henriette Wiull, Anne-Sofie Letting, Eldrid Langesaeter, Mette-Elise Estensen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ingvil Krarup SørbyeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8998-4285
Randi HaualandFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Henriette WiullFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anne-Sofie LettingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1321-0387
Eldrid LangesaeterDepartment of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Mette-Elise EstensenDepartment of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBeta-blockers are prescribed for many pregnant women with heart disease, but whether there is a dose-dependent effect on fetal growth remains to be examined. We aimed to investigate if antenatal beta-blocker use and dose were associated with delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant among women with heart disease. MATERIAL AND

methodsOur cohort included women with heart disease who delivered at Oslo University Hospital between 2006 and 2015. Maternal heart disease was classified into modified WHO risk scores. Women with beta-blocker treatment were dichotomized into whether they had been treated with a low or high dose based on clinical factors. We compared the risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant in women exposed to high doses, low doses, or with no exposure to antenatal beta-blockers while adjusting for severity of maternal heart disease in logistic regression models.

resultsOf a total of 540 pregnancies among women with heart disease, 163 (30.2%) were exposed to beta-blocker treatment. The majority were treated with metoprolol (86.5%). Almost twice as many babies in the beta-blocker group were small-for-gestational-age, compared with the non-exposed group (19.8 vs 9.5%, P < 0.001). Women using a high-dose beta-blocker had a five-fold increased risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant compared with non-exposure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.22-10.78, P < 0.001). Women using a low dose of beta-blocker had a two-fold increased risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant; however, the confidence interval included the null (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 0.83-3.72, P = 0.143). Results when restricting the analyses to metoprolol showed the same pattern, but with attenuation of risks.

conclusionsWe found a five-fold increased risk of delivering a small-for-gestational-age infant in women with heart disease treated with a high dose of beta-blocker, and a two-fold increased risk among those treated with a low dose, showing an apparent dose-response relation. Close monitoring of fetal growth is warranted among women with heart disease treated with beta-blockers. As drug therapy in pregnancy concerns both mother and fetus, an optimum balance for both should be the goal.

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesMetoprololFemaleFetal DevelopmentFetal Growth RetardationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgePregnancyMetoprololbeta-blockerbirthweightheart diseasemodified World Health Organization risk scorepregnancysmall-for-gestational-agez score

Identifiers

PMID35467752
PMCPMC9564806
OpenAlexW4224801732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.