Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35467725›Full record

ReviewJAMA pediatrics2022

Current State of Pediatric Reference Intervals and the Importance of Correctly Describing the Biochemistry of Child Development: A Review.

Alicia N Lyle, Fidelia Pokuah, Dennis J Dietzen, Edward C C Wong, Amy L Pyle-Eilola, John S Fuqua, Alison Woodworth, Patricia M Jones, Lara J Akinbami, Luigi R Garibaldi and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alicia N LyleDivision of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Fidelia PokuahDivision of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Dennis J DietzenDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, Laboratory Services, St Louis Children's Hospital, St Louis, Missouri.
Edward C C WongQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute and Children's National Hospital, Chantilly, Virginia.
Amy L Pyle-EilolaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio.
John S FuquaDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Alison WoodworthDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington.
Patricia M JonesDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center, Dallas.
Lara J AkinbamiNational Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland.
Luigi R GaribaldiDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Hubert W VesperDivision of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Appropriately established pediatric reference intervals are critical to the clinical decision-making process and should reflect the physiologic changes that occur during healthy child development. Reference intervals used in pediatric care today remain highly inconsistent across a broad range of common clinical biomarkers. Observations: This narrative review assesses biomarker-specific pediatric reference intervals and their clinical utility with respect to the underlying biological changes occurring during development. Pediatric reference intervals from PubMed-indexed articles published from January 2015 to April 2021, commercial laboratory websites, study cohorts, and pediatric reference interval books were all examined. Although large numbers of pediatric reference intervals are published for some biomarkers, very few are used by clinical and commercial laboratories. The patterns, extent, and timing of biomarker changes are highly variable, particularly during developmental stages with rapid physiologic changes. However, many pediatric reference intervals do not capture these changes and thus do not accurately reflect the underlying biochemistry of development, resulting in significant inconsistencies between reference intervals. Conclusions and Relevance: There is a need to correctly describe the biochemistry of child development as well as to identify strategies to develop accurate and consistent pediatric reference intervals for improved pediatric care.

Indexed as

FamilyBiomarkersChildClinical Decision-MakingHumansReference ValuesBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID35467725
PMCPMC10155856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.