Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35467423›Full record

ArticlemBio2022

Evidence for an ACE2-Independent Entry Pathway That Can Protect from Neutralization by an Antibody Used for COVID-19 Therapy.

Markus Hoffmann, Anzhalika Sidarovich, Prerna Arora, Nadine Krüger, Inga Nehlmeier, Amy Kempf, Luise Graichen, Martin S Winkler, Daniela Niemeyer, Christine Goffinet and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Patterns of Recombination in Coronaviruses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Structural basis of white-tailed deer,Journal of virology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Markus HoffmannInfection Biology Unit, German Primate Centergrid.418215.b, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4603-7696
Anzhalika SidarovichInfection Biology Unit, German Primate Centergrid.418215.b, Göttingen, Germany.
Prerna AroraInfection Biology Unit, German Primate Centergrid.418215.b, Göttingen, Germany.
Nadine KrügerInfection Biology Unit, German Primate Centergrid.418215.b, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4413-8699
Inga NehlmeierInfection Biology Unit, German Primate Centergrid.418215.b, Göttingen, Germany.
Amy KempfInfection Biology Unit, German Primate Centergrid.418215.b, Göttingen, Germany.
Luise GraichenInfection Biology Unit, German Primate Centergrid.418215.b, Göttingen, Germany.
Martin S WinklerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Göttingen Medical Center, and Georg-August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Daniela NiemeyerInstitute of Virology, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christine GoffinetInstitute of Virology, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christian DrostenInstitute of Virology, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian SchulzDivision of Molecular Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Hans-Martin JäckDivision of Molecular Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine 3, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Stefan PöhlmannInfection Biology Unit, German Primate Centergrid.418215.b, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6086-9136
German Primate Center · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEGerman Center for Infection Research · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) acquired mutations in the spike (S) protein, including E484K, that confer resistance to neutralizing antibodies. However, it is incompletely understood how these mutations impact viral entry into host cells. Here, we analyzed how mutations at position 484 that have been detected in COVID-19 patients impact cell entry and antibody-mediated neutralization. We report that mutation E484D markedly increased SARS-CoV-2 S-driven entry into the hepatoma cell line Huh-7 and the lung cell NCI-H1299 without augmenting ACE2 binding. Notably, mutation E484D largely rescued Huh-7 but not Vero cell entry from blockade by the neutralizing antibody Imdevimab and rendered Huh-7 cell entry ACE2-independent. These results suggest that the naturally occurring mutation E484D allows SARS-CoV-2 to employ an ACE2-independent mechanism for entry that is largely insensitive against Imdevimab, an antibody employed for COVID-19 therapy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Virus InternalizationAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsAntibodies, ViralCell LineChlorocebus aethiopsHumansMutationProtein BindingReceptors, VirusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVero CellsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralimdevimabReceptors, VirusSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2ACE2antibodyCOVID-19neutralizationspike

Identifiers

PMID35467423
PMCPMC9239067
OpenAlexW4224440849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.