Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35467324›Full record

Observational studyHepatology international2022

Renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and entecavir in liver transplant patients: a nationwide Korean registry study.

Juhan Lee, Jae Geun Lee, Shin Hwang, Kwang-Woong Lee, Jong Man Kim, Je Ho Ryu, Bong-Wan Kim, Dong Lak Choi, Young Kyoung You, Dong-Sik Kim and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Hepatology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Juhan LeeDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Geun LeeDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Shin HwangDepartment of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kwang-Woong LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong Man KimDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Je Ho RyuDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
Bong-Wan KimDepartment of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Dong Lak ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Catholic University of Daegu College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Young Kyoung YouDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dong-Sik KimDivision of HBP Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yang Won NahDepartment of Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Koo Jeong KangDepartment of Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jai Young ChoDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Hee Chul YuDepartment of Surgery, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Geun HongDepartment of Surgery, Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dongho ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ju Ik MoonDepartment of Surgery, Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Myoung Soo KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ysms91@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8975-8381
Yonsei University · KRDaegu Catholic University · KRUlsan College · KRAjou University · KRCatholic University of Korea · KREwha Womans University · KRJeonbuk National University · KRKeimyung University Dongsan Medical Center · KRKonyang University · KRKorea University · KRPusan National University Yangsan Hospital · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRSeoul National University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency (#2014-ER6301-00Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency 2014-ER6301-01Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency 2014-ER6301-02Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency 2017-ER6301-00Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency 2017-ER6301-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsTenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) have been recommended after liver transplantation to prevent recurrence of hepatitis B virus infection. Despite its proven efficacy, the renal safety of TDF has not been established in liver transplant recipients. We aimed to compare the effects of TDF and ETV on renal function in liver transplant recipients and to evaluate risk factors for renal dysfunction after liver transplantation.

methodsThis is a retrospective, observational multicenter study of data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry. We included adults who underwent liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus-related complications from April 2014 to December 2017 and received TDF or ETV post-transplantation. Renal dysfunction was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate decline by at least 20% from baseline (1 month post-transplantation). Median duration of follow-up was 29 months (interquartile range 19-42).

resultsA total of 804 liver transplant patients were included. The cumulative probability of renal dysfunction was significantly higher in the TDF group than in the ETV group. Multivariable analysis confirmed that TDF was independently associated with an increased risk of renal dysfunction (hazard ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.92; p = 0.005). Independent risk factors for renal dysfunction included older age, worse baseline renal function, and low body mass index. Overall survival rate was significantly lower in patients with renal dysfunction than in those without.

conclusionsIn this nationwide study, the use of TDF was associated with an increased risk of renal dysfunction, when compared with ETV.

Indexed as

Hepatitis B, ChronicKidney DiseasesLiver TransplantationAdultAntiviral AgentsGuanineHepatitis B virusHumansKidneyRegistriesRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesTenofovirTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsentecavirGuanineTenofovirEntecavirHepatitis B virusLiver transplantationRenal dysfunctionTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID35467324
OpenAlexW4226052217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.