Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35467213›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Optical Imaging Resources for Crop Phenotyping and Stress Detection.

Phatchareeya Waiphara, Cyril Bourgenot, Lindsey J Compton, Ankush Prashar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Phatchareeya WaipharaSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Cyril BourgenotPrecision Optics Laboratory, Durham University, Sedgefield, UK.
Lindsey J ComptonSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ankush PrasharSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Ankush.prashar@newcastle.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With a rapidly increasing population, diminishing resource availability, and variation in environment, there is a need to change agricultural production to deliver long-term food security. To deliver such change, we need crops that are productive and tolerant to different stress factors. The traditional methods of obtaining data for phenotyping under field conditions, e.g., for morphological traits such as canopy structure or physiological traits such as plant stress-related traits, are laborious and time-consuming. A variety of imaging tools in the visible, spectral, and thermal infrared ranges allow data collection for quantitative studies of complex traits and crop monitoring. These tools can be used on crop phenotyping and monitoring platforms for high-throughput assessment of traits in order to better understand plant stress responses and the physiological pathways underlying yield. The applications and brief review of these imaging techniques are described and discussed in this chapter.

Indexed as

AgricultureCrops, AgriculturalOptical ImagingPhenotypeMultispectral and hyperspectral sensingPlant stressSpectral imagingThermal imaging

Identifiers

PMID35467213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.