ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022
Screening for Abiotic Stress Response in Rice.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is the staple food for over half of the world population. However, most rice varieties are severely injured by abiotic stresses, with strong social and economic impacts. Understanding rice responses to stress may guide breeding for more tolerant varieties. However, the lack of consistency in the design of the stress experiments described in the literature limits comparative studies and output assessments. The use of identical setups is the only way to generate comparable data. This chapter comprises three sections, describing the experimental conditions established at the Genomics of Plant Stress (GPlantS) unit of ITQB NOVA to assess the response of rice plants to different abiotic stresses-high salinity, cold, drought, simulated drought, and submergence-and their recovery capacity when intended. All sections include a detailed description of the materials and methodology and useful notes gathered from our team experience. We use seedlings since rice plants at this stage show high sensitivity to abiotic stresses. For the salt, cold, and simulated drought (PEG, polyethylene glycol) stress assays, we grow rice seedlings in a hydroponic system, while for the drought assay, plants are grown in soil and subjected to water withholding. For submergence, we use water-filled Magenta boxes. All setups enable visual score determination and are suitable for sample collection during stress imposition and also recovery. The proposed methodologies are affordable and straightforward to implement in most labs, allowing the discrimination of several rice genotypes at the molecular and phenotypic levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35467207What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.