Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35467144›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Bile leak incidence, risk factors and associated outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy: a contemporary NSQIP propensity matched analysis.

Charles C Vining, Kristine Kuchta, Amr I Al Abbas, Phillip J Hsu, Pierce Paterakos, Darryl Schuitevoerder, Divya Sood, Kevin K Roggin, Mark S Talamonti, Melissa E Hogg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Charles C ViningDepartment of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6665-4064
Kristine KuchtaDepartment of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Walgreens Building-Floor 2, 2650 Ridge Road, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Amr I Al AbbasDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, USA.
Phillip J HsuDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Pierce PaterakosDepartment of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Walgreens Building-Floor 2, 2650 Ridge Road, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Darryl SchuitevoerderDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Divya SoodDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Kevin K RogginDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Mark S TalamontiDepartment of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Walgreens Building-Floor 2, 2650 Ridge Road, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Melissa E HoggDepartment of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Walgreens Building-Floor 2, 2650 Ridge Road, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA. MHogg@Northshore.org.
NorthShore University HealthSystem · USUniversity of Chicago · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite advances in surgical technique, bile leak remains a common complication following hepatectomy. We sought to identify incidence of, risk factors for, and outcomes associated with biliary leak. STUDY

designThis is an ACS-NSQIP study. Distribution of bile leak stratified by surgical approach and hepatectomy type were identified. Univariate and multivariate factors associated with bile leak and outcomes were evaluated.

resultsRobotic hepatectomy was associated with less bile leak (5.4% vs. 11.4%; p < 0.001) compared to open. There were no significant differences in bile leak between robotic and laparoscopic hepatectomy (5.4% vs. 5.3%; p = 0.905, respectively). Operative factors risk factors for bile leak in patients undergoing robotic hepatectomy included right hepatectomy [OR 4.42 (95% CI 1.74-11.20); p = 0.002], conversion [OR 4.40 (95% CI 1.39-11.72); p = 0.010], pringle maneuver [OR 3.19 (95% CI 1.03-9.88); p = 0.044], and drain placement [OR 28.25 (95% CI 8.34-95.72); p < 0.001]. Bile leak was associated with increased reoperation (8.7% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001), 30-day readmission (26.6% vs 6.8%, p < 0.001), 30-day mortality (2% vs 0.9%, p < 0.001), and complications (67.2% vs 23.4%, p < 0.001) for patients undergoing MIS hepatectomy.

conclusionWhile MIS confers less risk for bile leak than open hepatectomy, risk factors for bile leak in patients undergoing MIS hepatectomy were identified. Bile leaks were associated with multiple additional complications, and the robotic approach had an equal risk for bile leak than laparoscopic in this time period.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract DiseasesHepatectomyBileHumansIncidencePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeBile leakHepatectomyMinimally invasiveOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID35467144
OpenAlexW4224440057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.