Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35467111›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2022

Nestmate recognition in the Amazonian stingless bee Melipona paraensis.

Paulo Pacheco Junior, Serafino Teseo, Nicolas Châline, Henrique Lanhoso, Arley da Costa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paulo Pacheco JuniorUniversidade Do Estado Do Amapá, Macapá, AP, Brazil. paulo.pacheco.junior@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1691-159X
Serafino TeseoIndependent scholar, Pescara, Italy. serafinoteseo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0797-1032
Nicolas ChâlineLEEEIS, Departamento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6714-9297
Henrique LanhosoLEEEIS, Departamento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Arley da CostaNúcleo ÍTACA, Departamento de Psicologia, Instituto de Ciências Humanas E Sociais, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Volta Redonda, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7770-0254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meliponine bees use chemical-based nestmate discrimination to protect their colonies from unrelated intruders. However, species from the Amazon basin are relatively poorly known from this perspective. Here, we investigated Melipona paraensis nestmate discrimination in different contexts (nests vs. neutral arenas), testing aggression in bees facing other bees varying in age and origin (same/different colony or a different kleptoparasitic meliponine species) or experimentally treated with odors from unrelated colonies. As expected, M. paraensis did not discriminate against callow non-nestmate workers with weak/undifferentiated chemical signatures. Workers specialized in nest defense aggressed intruders more often than non-specialized workers, but were less aggressive in neutral arenas than in the nest. Our study provides novel behavioral information relevant for social insect research and meliponiculture.

Indexed as

AggressionRecognition, PsychologyAnimalsBeesOdorantsApoideaMeliponiniNative pollinatorsNestmate discrimination

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.