ReviewHerz2022
[Cost-benefit analysis of new lipid-lowering agents].
Review in Herz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease have a high risk for subsequent cardiovascular events despite optimal drug treatment including statins and ezetimibe. Dyslipidemia represents a central and direct cause of this, with a frequent failure to achieve the target values recommended in the guidelines. New lipid-lowering substances are increasingly becoming available for treatment of this residual risk. Due to their high cost, cost-effectiveness analyses are required in order to justify their use. Important variables when considering the cost-effectiveness of a drug are quality adjusted life years (QALY) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The lower bounds of the ICER determining the cost-effectiveness of a treatment vary between healthcare systems. The proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors alirocumab and evolocumab are deemed to be cost-effective particularly in patients with high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) prior to treatment or with a high cardiovascular risk as determined by the presence of defined risk criteria. Similar considerations apply to the PCSK9 small interfering RNA (siRNA) inclisiran. Administration of bempedoic acid is deemed cost-effective especially in patients with statin intolerance. Eicosapentaenoic acid is deemed cost-effective overall, although the data with respect to the exact placebo-controlled efficacy are still inconclusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.