Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35466939›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2022

Machine Learning Based Multimodal Neuroimaging Genomics Dementia Score for Predicting Future Conversion to Alzheimer's Disease.

Ghazal Mirabnahrazam, Da Ma, Sieun Lee, Karteek Popuri, Hyunwoo Lee, Jiguo Cao, Lei Wang, James E Galvin, Mirza Faisal Beg, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Genetic analysis of neurodegenerative diseases.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ghazal MirabnahrazamSchool of Engineering, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Da MaSchool of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Sieun LeeSchool of Engineering, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Karteek PopuriSchool of Engineering, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Hyunwoo LeeDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jiguo CaoDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Lei WangPsychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
James E GalvinComprehensive Center for Brain Health, Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Mirza Faisal BegSchool of Engineering, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
TDP-43 Loss-of-Function: Biology to BiomarkersP01AG019724 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jennifer Merrilees · 2002 to 2026
$67.2M
Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
Multicultural Community Dementia ScreeningR01AG071514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GALVIN, JAMES E · 2021 to 2025
$13.8M
Reducing Disparities in Dementia and VCID Outcomes in a Multicultural Rural PopulationR01NS101483 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GALVIN, JAMES E · 2019 to 2023
$8.0M
Digital Detection of Dementia Studies (D cubed Studies).R01AG069765 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BEN-MILED, ZINA, BOUSTANI, MALAZ · 2020 to 2024
$4.9M
PREDICT-ADFTD: Multimodal Imaging Prediction of AD/FTD and Differential DiagnosisR01AG055121 · NIA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROSEN, HOWARD J, WANG, LEI · 2017 to 2020
$2.8M
Multimodal Imaging in Frontotemporal DegenerationK24AG045333 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ROSEN, HOWARD J · 2013 to 2023
$1.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420NIA NIH HHS K24 AG045333NIA NIH HHS P01 AG019724NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055121NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069765NIA NIH HHS R01 AG071514NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS101483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing availability of databases containing both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and genetic data allows researchers to utilize multimodal data to better understand the characteristics of dementia of Alzheimer's type (DAT).

objectiveThe goal of this study was to develop and analyze novel biomarkers that can help predict the development and progression of DAT.

methodsWe used feature selection and ensemble learning classifier to develop an image/genotype-based DAT score that represents a subject's likelihood of developing DAT in the future. Three feature types were used: MRI only, genetic only, and combined multimodal data. We used a novel data stratification method to better represent different stages of DAT. Using a pre-defined 0.5 threshold on DAT scores, we predicted whether a subject would develop DAT in the future.

resultsOur results on Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database showed that dementia scores using genetic data could better predict future DAT progression for currently normal control subjects (Accuracy = 0.857) compared to MRI (Accuracy = 0.143), while MRI can better characterize subjects with stable mild cognitive impairment (Accuracy = 0.614) compared to genetics (Accuracy = 0.356). Combining MRI and genetic data showed improved classification performance in the remaining stratified groups.

conclusionMRI and genetic data can contribute to DAT prediction in different ways. MRI data reflects anatomical changes in the brain, while genetic data can detect the risk of DAT progression prior to the symptomatic onset. Combining information from multimodal data appropriately can improve prediction performance.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionBrainDisease ProgressionGenomicsHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingAlzheimer’s diseasebiomarkerearly detectionmachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingrisk scoressingle nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID35466939
PMCPMC9195128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.