Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35466937›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2022

What Influences the Willingness of Blacks and African Americans to Enroll in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Biomarker Research? A Qualitative Vignette Analysis.

Fred B Ketchum, Claire M Erickson, Nathaniel A Chin, Carey E Gleason, Nickolas H Lambrou, Susan Flowers Benton, Lindsay R Clark

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Randomized Comparison of Online Motivational Themes in Clinical Trial Recruitment.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Return of research results across the Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers network.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  7. The Consortium for Clarity in ADRD Research Through Imaging (CLARiTI).Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The ADNI PET Core at 20.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Review
  11. Reasons for undergoing amyloid imaging among diverse enrollees in the A4 study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Post-disclosure distress among racial and ethnic groups in a preclinical AD trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  13. Views and Perceptions of Amyloid Imaging in a Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Trial.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fred B KetchumDepartment of Neurology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Claire M EricksonNeuroscience & Public Policy Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Nathaniel A ChinWisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Madison, WI, USA.
Carey E GleasonWisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Madison, WI, USA.
Nickolas H LambrouWisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Madison, WI, USA.
Susan Flowers BentonDepartment of Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, Southern University and A & M College Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Lindsay R ClarkWisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USSouthern University and Agricultural and Mechanical College · US

Funding

Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention: Sex Differences in DNA MethylationR01AG027161 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Nathaniel Ark Chin, Sterling C Johnson · 2007 to 2026
$35.6M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG062715 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Sanjay Asthana · 2019 to 2026
$34.5M
Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's PreventionRF1AG027161 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JOHNSON, STERLING C · 2018 to 2018
$18.8M
African Americans Fighting Alzheimer’s in Midlife (AA-FAIM)R01AG054059 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CAREY E GLEASON · 2016 to 2026
$15.3M
Alzheimer's disease biomarker disclosure in African Americans and Whites – Personal and programmatic consequences of knowing ATN statusR03AG062975 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CLARK, LINDSAY RENEE · 2019 to 2020
$155k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062715NIA NIH HHS R01 AG027161NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054059NIA NIH HHS R03 AG062975NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG027161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) begins with an asymptomatic "preclinical" phase, in which abnormal biomarkers indicate risk for developing cognitive impairment. Research is increasingly focused on validating biomarkers to improve reliable diagnosis and timely clinical treatment of AD. Most preclinical biomarker research lacks adequate representation of Black/African American and other racially and ethnically minoritized individuals, limiting the applicability of data to these groups. This may exacerbate existing disparities by hindering diagnosis and treatment among racially and ethnically minoritized individuals.

objectiveUnderstand the factors influencing willingness of Blacks/African Americans to participate in AD biomarker research and identify opportunities to improve enrollment.

methodsWe enrolled Blacks/African Americans (N = 145) between 46-85 years of age who had previously participated in AD research. Participants gave open-ended responses to a vignette describing a hypothetical biomarker research study. Using qualitative content analysis, we identified themes that motivated and discouraged enrollment in AD biomarker research.

resultsParticipant responses were categorized into several themes. Themes motivating participation included a desire to know their biomarker results and to support research. Major themes discouraging participation included concerns about potential negative psychological outcomes to learning one's increased risk for AD, doubt about the usefulness of testing, and worry about the potential physical harms of testing.

conclusionUnderstanding themes motivating and discouraging AD preclinical biomarker research participation may inform research material development, approach to community engagement, and/or trial design to increase enrollment of Blacks/African Americans.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionBiomarkersBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleHumansBiomarkersAfrican AmericansAlzheimer’s diseasebiomarkersqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35466937
PMCPMC9198766
OpenAlexW4224245534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.