ArticleJournal of X-ray science and technology2022
Correlation between X-ray tube current exposure time and X-ray photon number in GATE.
Article in Journal of X-ray science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundX-ray image quality relies heavily on the emitted X-ray photon number which depends on X-ray tube current and exposure time. To accurately estimate the absorbed dose in an imaging protocol, it is better to simulate the X-ray imaging with a Monte Carlo platform such as GATE (Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission). Although input of GATE is the X-ray photon number of the simulated X-ray tube, it lacks a good way to setup the photon number for a desired X-ray tube current setting.
objectiveTo provide a method to correlate the experimental X-ray tube current exposure time and the X-ray photon number in GATE.
methodsThe accumulated radiation dose of a micro-computed tomography (CT) X-ray tube was recorded at different current exposure times with a general-purpose ion chamber. GATE was used to model the experimental microCT imaging system and calculate the total absorbed dose (cGy) in the sensitive volume of the ion chamber with different X-ray photon numbers. Linear regression models are used to establish a correlation between the estimated X-ray photon number and the X-ray tube settings. At first, one model establishes the relationship between the experimentally measured dose and the X-ray tube setting. Then, another model establishes a relationship between the simulated dose and the X-ray number in GATE. At last, by correlating these two models, a regression model to estimate the X-ray output number from an experimental X-ray tube setting (mAs) is obtained.
resultsFor a typical micro-CT scan, the X-ray tube is operated at 50 kVp and 0.5 mA for a 500 ms exposure time per projection (0.25 mAs). For these X-ray imaging parameters, the X-ray number per projection is estimated to be 3.613×106 with 1.0 mm Al filter.
conclusionThe findings of this work provide an approach to correlate the experimental X-ray tube current exposure time to the X-ray photon number in the GATE simulation of the X-ray tube to more accurately determine radiation dose for an imaging protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.