Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35466741›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2022

In-ovo imaging using ostrich eggs: Biomagnetism for detection of cardiac signals and embryonal motion.

Martin Freesmeyer, Hanna Hermeyer, Christian Kuehnel, Olga Perkas, Julia Greiser, Otto W Witte, Thomas Winkens

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. In-ovo imaging using ostrich eggs: biodistribution of F-18-FDG in ostrich embryos.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Different narcotic gases and concentrations for immobilization of ostrich embryos forExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin FreesmeyerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena 07747, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6462-3851
Hanna HermeyerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena 07747, Germany.
Christian KuehnelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena 07747, Germany.
Olga PerkasDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena 07747, Germany.
Julia GreiserDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena 07747, Germany.
Otto W WitteDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena 07747, Germany.
Thomas WinkensDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena 07747, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8958-4801
Jena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-ovo imaging using ostrich eggs has been described as a potential alternative to common animal testing. The main advantage is its independence from small animal imaging devices as ostrich eggs provide good image quality on regular CT, MRI, or PET used in examinations of humans. However, embryonal motion during dynamic imaging studies produce artifacts. The aims of this study were (1) to explore the feasibility of biomagnetism to detect cardiac signals and embryonal motion and to use these findings (2) to investigate the effect of isoflurane anesthesia on ostrich embryos. A standard magnetoencephalography developed for brain studies was used to detect embryonal signals of ostrich eggs on developmental day 34. Signals were instantly shown on a screen and data were also postprocessed. For assessing the effects of anesthesia, nine ostrich eggs were investigated using isoflurane 6% for 90 min. Biomagnetic signals were recorded simultaneously. A control group consisting of eight different ostrich eggs was also investigated. Cardiac signals similar to electrocardiography were observed in all eggs. Postprocessing revealed frequent motion of embryos without anesthesia. The exposure to isoflurane led to a significant decrease in motion signals in 9/9 ostrich embryos after 8 min. Motion was significantly reduced in the isoflurane group versus control group. There were no isoflurane-related deaths. This study shows that biomagnetism is feasible to detect cardiac signals and motion of ostrich embryos in-ovo. Application of isoflurane is safe and leads to a rapid decrease in embryonal motion, which is an important prerequisite for the implementation of in-ovo imaging using ostrich eggs.

Indexed as

StruthioniformesAnimalsArtifactsDiagnostic ImagingEggsMotionalternative animal testingbiomagnetismIn-ovo imagingisoflurane anesthesiaostrich eggs

Identifiers

PMID35466741
PMCPMC9265528
OpenAlexW4224434571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.