Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35466555›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic surgery2022

Animal Models for Postoperative Implant-Related Spinal Infection.

Yongjie Wang, Mingxue Che, Zhi Zheng, Jun Liu, Xue Ji, Yang Sun, Jingguo Xin, Weiquan Gong, Shibo Na, Yuanzhe Jin and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yongjie WangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6891-7892
Mingxue CheDepartment of Spinal Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Zhi ZhengDepartment of Spinal Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jun LiuInstitute of Military Veterinary Science, the Academy of Military Medical Science of PLA, Changchun, China.
Xue JiInstitute of Military Veterinary Science, the Academy of Military Medical Science of PLA, Changchun, China.
Yang SunInstitute of Military Veterinary Science, the Academy of Military Medical Science of PLA, Changchun, China.
Jingguo XinDepartment of Spinal Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7766-0056
Weiquan GongDepartment of Spinal Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Shibo NaDepartment of Spinal Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yuanzhe JinDepartment of Spinal Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Shuo WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Shaokun ZhangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative infections following implant-related spinal surgery are severe and disastrous complications for both orthopaedic surgeons and patients worldwide. They can cause neurological damage, disability, and death. To better understand the mechanism of these destructive complications and intervene in the process, further research is needed. Therefore, there is an urgent need for efficient, accurate, and easily available animal models to study the pathogenesis of spinal infections and develop new and effective anti-bacterial methods. In this paper, we provide a general review of the commonly used animal models of postoperative implant-related spinal infections, describe their advantages and disadvantages, and highlight the significance of correctly choosing the model according to the infection aspect under investigation. These models are valuable tools contributing to the better understanding of postoperative spinal infections and will continue to facilitate the invention of novel preventative and treatment strategies for patients with postoperative spinal infections. However, although they are valid and reproducible in some respects, the current animal models present certain limitations. Future ideal spinal infection animal models may assess the bacterial load of the same animal in real-time in vivo, and better mimic the human anatomy as well as surgical techniques. Strains other than Staphylococcus aureus account for a large proportion of postoperative spinal infections, and thus, the establishment of models to evaluate other types of microbial infections is expected in the future. Furthermore, novel transgenic models established on advancements in genome editing are also likely to be developed in the future.

Indexed as

Prosthesis-Related InfectionsStaphylococcal InfectionsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansPostoperative ComplicationsProstheses and ImplantsSpineStaphylococcus aureusAnimal modelsImplantSpinal infectionSpine

Identifiers

PMID35466555
PMCPMC9163983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.