Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35466353›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses2022

An Online Training Program to Improve Clinicians' Skills in Communicating About Serious Illness.

William C Gautier, Menna Abaye, Shelly Dev, Jennifer B Seaman, Rachel A Butler, Marie K Norman, Robert M Arnold, Holly O Witteman, Tara E Cook, Deepika Mohan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Trial
  2. High-fidelity simulation programs in ICU-related ethical non-technical skills training: A narrative review.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

William C GautierWilliam C. Gautier is a medical student, School of Medicine; Department of Critical Care Medicine; Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center; Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Menna AbayeMenna Abaye is a research project manager, School of Medicine; Department of Critical Care Medicine; Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center; Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Shelly DevShelly Dev is an assistant professor, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.
Jennifer B SeamanJennifer B. Seaman is an assistant professor, School of Nursing, Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Rachel A ButlerRachel A. Butler is a research program manager, School of Medicine; Department of Critical Care Medicine; Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center; Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Marie K NormanMarie K. Norman is an associate professor, School of Medicine, General Internal Medicine, Medicine and Clinical and Translational Science, Innovation Design for Education and Assessment (IDEA) Lab, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Robert M ArnoldRobert M. Arnold is a professor, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Palliative and Supportive Institute, Pennsylvania.
Holly O WittemanHolly O. Witteman is a professor, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine & Office of Education and Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Québec, Canada.
Tara E CookTara E. Cook was an assistant professor, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Deepika MohanDeepika Mohan is an associate professor, School of Medicine; Department of Critical Care Medicine; Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center; Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Douglas B WhiteDouglas B. White is a professor, School of Medicine; Department of Critical Care Medicine; Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center; Program on Ethics and Decision Making in Critical Illness, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Stepped Wedge Trial of an Intervention to Support Proxy Decision Makers in ICUsR01NR014663 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WHITE, DOUGLAS B · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
Mentored Patient Oriented Research in Improving Surrogate Decision Making for Patients with Advanced Respiratory FailureK24HL148314 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Douglas B White · 2019 to 2026
$944k
NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL148314NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge-scale efforts to train clinicians in serious-illness communication skills are needed, but 2 important gaps in knowledge remain. (1) No proven training method exists that can be readily scaled to train thousands of clinicians. (2) Though the value of interprofessional collaboration to support incapacitated patients' surrogates is increasingly recognized, few interventions for training intensive care unit (ICU) nurses in important communication skills can be leveraged to provide interprofessional family support.

objectiveTo develop and test a web/videoconference-based platform to train nurses to communicate about serious illness.

methodsA user-centered process was used to develop the intervention, including (1) iteratively engaging a stakeholder panel, (2) developing prototype and beta versions of the platform, and (3) 3 rounds of user testing with 13 ICU nurses. Participants' ratings of usability, acceptability, and perceived effectiveness were assessed quantitatively and qualitatively.

resultsStakeholders stressed that the intervention should leverage interactive learning and a streamlined digital interface. A training platform was developed consisting of 6 interactive online training lessons and 3 group-based video-conference practice sessions. Participants rated the program as usable (mean summary score 84 [96th percentile]), acceptable (mean, 4.5/5; SD, 0.7), and effective (mean, 4.8/5; SD, 0.6). Ten of 13 nurses would recommend the intervention over 2-day in-person training.

conclusionsNurses testing this web-based training program judged it usable, acceptable, and effective. These data support proceeding with an appropriately powered efficacy trial.

Indexed as

CommunicationIntensive Care UnitsNursesEducation, DistanceEducation, NursingHumans

Identifiers

PMID35466353
PMCPMC10316342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.