ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022
A Retrospective Study of 320 Patients Treated with Carotid Artery Stenting at 4 General Hospitals in Zhejiang Province to Establish a Risk Score for Cerebral Hypoperfusion Syndrome.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cerebral hypoperfusion syndrome (CHS) includes a spectrum of clinical symptoms, ranging from focal neurologic deficit to intracerebral hemorrhage. CHS was initially described as a complication of carotid endarterectomy but also occurs following carotid artery stenting. This retrospective study included 320 patients treated with carotid artery stenting at 4 general hospitals in Zhejiang Province between June 2019 and June 2021 and aimed to establish a risk score for CHS. MATERIAL AND METHODS Through retrospective case analysis, a risk model and scoring model for CHS were established and evaluated. RESULTS Poor integrity of the circle of Willis, preoperative cerebrovascular resistance, mean transit time, peak time at CTP, and preoperative cerebral circulation time were significant in the univariate analysis and were entered into the regression equation to establish the logistic and additive scoring model for predicting the risk of CHS after carotid stenting. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the logistic scoring system for the early warning risk of CHS after carotid stenting was 0.964 (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.931-0.996]), and the area under the ROC curve of the CHS early risk additive scoring model after carotid stenting was 0.968 (95% CI [0.936-1.000]), The Hosmer-Lemeshow test chi-square values were 0.037 (P=0.848) and 2.671 (P=0.102). CONCLUSIONS Two methods of scoring risk for CHS were developed from a retrospective analysis of 320 patients treated with carotid artery stenting at 4 general hospitals in Zhejian Province between June 2019 and June 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.