Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35466284›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2022

A Retrospective Study of 320 Patients Treated with Carotid Artery Stenting at 4 General Hospitals in Zhejiang Province to Establish a Risk Score for Cerebral Hypoperfusion Syndrome.

Yuan Liu, Changyang Zhong, Peng Wang, Jianhong Yang, Chenghua Xu, Zuyong Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yuan LiuDepartment of Neurology, Hangzhou Third People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Changyang ZhongDepartment of Neurology, Hangzhou Third People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Peng WangDepartment of Neurology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Jianhong YangDepartment of Neurology, Ningbo First People's Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Chenghua XuDepartment of Neurology, Taizhou First People's Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Zuyong ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hangzhou Third People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China (mainland).
Third People's Hospital of Hangzhou · CNNingbo First Hospital · CNTaizhou First People's Hospital · CNZhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Cerebral hypoperfusion syndrome (CHS) includes a spectrum of clinical symptoms, ranging from focal neurologic deficit to intracerebral hemorrhage. CHS was initially described as a complication of carotid endarterectomy but also occurs following carotid artery stenting. This retrospective study included 320 patients treated with carotid artery stenting at 4 general hospitals in Zhejiang Province between June 2019 and June 2021 and aimed to establish a risk score for CHS. MATERIAL AND METHODS Through retrospective case analysis, a risk model and scoring model for CHS were established and evaluated. RESULTS Poor integrity of the circle of Willis, preoperative cerebrovascular resistance, mean transit time, peak time at CTP, and preoperative cerebral circulation time were significant in the univariate analysis and were entered into the regression equation to establish the logistic and additive scoring model for predicting the risk of CHS after carotid stenting. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the logistic scoring system for the early warning risk of CHS after carotid stenting was 0.964 (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.931-0.996]), and the area under the ROC curve of the CHS early risk additive scoring model after carotid stenting was 0.968 (95% CI [0.936-1.000]), The Hosmer-Lemeshow test chi-square values were 0.037 (P=0.848) and 2.671 (P=0.102). CONCLUSIONS Two methods of scoring risk for CHS were developed from a retrospective analysis of 320 patients treated with carotid artery stenting at 4 general hospitals in Zhejian Province between June 2019 and June 2021.

Indexed as

Carotid StenosisCerebrovascular DisordersEndarterectomy, CarotidCarotid ArteriesCerebrovascular CirculationHospitals, GeneralHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStentsSyndrome

Identifiers

PMID35466284
PMCPMC9052956
OpenAlexW4221084779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.