Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35466231›Full record

ReviewMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Genital Wound Repair and Scarring.

Ursula Mirastschijski, Dongsheng Jiang, Yuval Rinkevich

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ursula MirastschijskiMira-Beau Gender Esthetics Berlin, 10777 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3964-8851
Dongsheng JiangComprehensive Pneumology Center, Institute of Lung Biology and Disease, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 81377 München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0961-2671
Yuval RinkevichComprehensive Pneumology Center, Institute of Lung Biology and Disease, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 81377 München, Germany.
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DEUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

MORPHINE AND ANALOGUES EFFECTS ON CELL METABOLISMR01DA000017 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SIMON, ERIC J · 1985 to 2007
$2.0M
NEW PSYCHOMETRIC METHODS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE RESEARCHK05DA000017 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BENTLER, PETER M · 1986 to 2012
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA000017NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA000017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin wound repair has been the central focus of clinicians and scientists for almost a century. Insights into acute and chronic wound healing as well as scarring have influenced and ameliorated wound treatment. Our knowledge of normal skin notwithstanding, little is known of acute and chronic wound repair of genital skin. In contrast to extra-genital skin, hypertrophic scarring is uncommon in genital tissue. Chronic wound healing disorders of the genitals are mostly confined to mucosal tissue diseases. This article will provide insights into the differences between extra-genital and genital skin with regard to anatomy, physiology and aberrant wound repair. In light of fundamental differences between genital and normal skin, it is recommended that reconstructive and esthetic surgery should exclusively be performed by specialists with profound expertise in genital wound repair.

Indexed as

Cicatrix, HypertrophicSkinGenitaliaHumansUrogenital Systemforeskingenital biomechanicsgenital scarringgenital skingenital wound healingintracrine hormone productionlichen sclerosussmall and big labia

Identifiers

PMID35466231
PMCPMC9036227
OpenAlexW4224225168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.