Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35466224›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2022

Microbial Adhesion to Dental Polymers for Conventional, Computer-Aided Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing: A Comparative In Vitro Study.

Sergey Arutyunov, Levon Kirakosyan, Lubov Dubova, Yaser Kharakh, Nikolay Malginov, Gadzhi Akhmedov, Viktor Tsarev

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sergey ArutyunovPropaedeutics of Dental Diseases Department, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6512-8724
Levon KirakosyanPropaedeutics of Dental Diseases Department, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5380-1475
Lubov DubovaOrthopedic Dentistry Department, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2651-2699
Yaser KharakhPropaedeutics of Dental Diseases Department, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7181-8211
Nikolay MalginovProsthodontics Technology Department, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473 Moscow, Russia.
Gadzhi AkhmedovSurgical Dentistry Department, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9380-6868
Viktor TsarevMicrobiology, Virology, Immunology Department, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3311-0367
Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern structural materials are represented by a variety of polymer materials used for dental patients' rehabilitation. They differ not only in physico-chemical properties, but also in microbiological properties, which is one of the reasons why these materials are chosen. The study focused on the microbial adhesion of clinical isolates of normal (5 types), periodontopathogenic (2 types), and fungal (2 types) microbiotas to various materials based on polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) intended for traditional (cold-cured and hot-cured polymers), computer-aided subtractive and additive manufacturing. A comparative analysis was carried out on the studied samples of polymer materials according to the microorganisms' adhesion index (AI). The lowest level of microorganisms' AI of the three types of microbiotas was determined in relation to materials for additive manufacturing. The AI of hot-cured polymers, as well as materials for subtractive manufacturing, corresponded to the average level. The highest level of microorganisms' adhesion was found in cold-cured polymers. Significant differences in AI for materials of the same technological production type (different manufacturers) were also determined. The tendency of significant differences in the indicators of the microorganisms' adhesion level for the studied polymer materials on the basis of the type of production technology was determined.

Indexed as

acrylic resinsbacterial loadclinicalclinical reasoningdentaldental prosthesisdentistrymicrobiologypathologyprosthodonticstechnology

Identifiers

PMID35466224
PMCPMC9036260
OpenAlexW4223474328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.