Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35466214›Full record

ArticleJournal of xenobiotics2022

Toxicity Assessment and Control of Early Blight and Stem Rot of

Ravinder Kumar, Joginder Singh Duhan, Anju Manuja, Pawan Kaur, Balvinder Kumar, Pardeep Kumar Sadh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of xenobiotics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ravinder KumarDepartment of Biotechnology, Chaudhary Devi Lal University, Sirsa 125055, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7735-6740
Joginder Singh DuhanDepartment of Biotechnology, Chaudhary Devi Lal University, Sirsa 125055, India.
Anju ManujaICAR-National Research Centre on Equines, Sirsa Road, Hisar 125001, India.
Pawan KaurTERI Deakin Nanobiotechnology Centre, The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi 110003, India.
Balvinder KumarICAR-National Research Centre on Equines, Sirsa Road, Hisar 125001, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2748-4749
Pardeep Kumar SadhDepartment of Biotechnology, Chaudhary Devi Lal University, Sirsa 125055, India.
Chaudhary Devi Lal University · INNational Research Centre on Equines · INEnergy and Resources Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biopolymers such as chitosan and gum acacia are used for nanotechnological applications due to their biosafety and ecofriendly nature. The commercial fungicide mancozeb (M) was loaded into chitosan-gum acacia (CSGA) polymers to form nanocomposite (NC) CSGA-M (mancozeb-loaded) measuring 363.6 nm via the ionic gelation and polyelectrolyte complexation method. The physico-chemical study of nano CSGA-M was accomplished using dynamic light scattering (DLS), scanning electron microscope (SEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Nano CSGA-M-1.0 (containing 1.0 mg/mL mancozeb) at 1.5 ppm demonstrated a maximum inhibition (83.8 ± 0.7%) against

Indexed as

antifungal efficacychitosan–gum acacia nanocompositecytotoxicityionic gelationmancozebplant diseases

Identifiers

PMID35466214
PMCPMC9036208
OpenAlexW4224053070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.