Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35466087›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2022

Comparison of dimensional accuracy between direct-printed and thermoformed aligners.

Nickolas Koenig, Jin-Young Choi, Julie McCray, Andrew Hayes, Patricia Schneider, Ki Beom Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Accuracy of three-dimensionally printed retainers and aligners : A systematic review.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Accuracy of orthodontic movement with nocturnal three-dimensionally printed and thermoformed aligners : Retrospective cohort study comparing two different treatments protocols.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. High-Performance Recycling Biobased Photopolymers for 3D Printing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nickolas KoenigDepartment of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1319-7805
Jin-Young ChoiDepartment of Orthodontics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9094-2194
Julie McCrayDepartment of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Andrew HayesDepartment of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Patricia SchneiderDepartment of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Ki Beom KimDepartment of Orthodontics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-3527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the dimensional accuracy between thermoformed and direct-printed aligners. Methods: Three types of aligners were manufactured from the same reference standard tessellation language (STL) file: thermoformed aligners were manufactured using Zendura FLX Results: Mean absolute discrepancies in the Zendura FLX Conclusions: This study showed greater trueness and precision of direct-printed aligners than thermoformed aligners.

Indexed as

AlignerPhysical propertyResinThree-dimensional scanner

Identifiers

PMID35466087
PMCPMC9314211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.