Detection of Protein-Ligand Interactions by

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Enhancing NMR Signals in Liquids by Fluorine-19 Overhauser Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (DNP) and Hyperpolarization Transfer to Carbon-13.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
   Article
2. Parahydrogen in Reversible Exchange Induces Long-LivedAnalytical chemistry · 2023
   Article
3. Nuclear Overhauser spectroscopy in hyperpolarized water - chemicalChemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as