Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35465627›Full record

ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2022

Development of the Warwick Axial Spondyloarthritis faTigue and Energy questionnaire (WASTEd)-a new patient-reported outcome measure.

Nathan A Pearson, Elizabeth Tutton, Jane Martindale, George Strickland, Jean Thompson, Jonathan C Packham, Paul Creamer, Kirstie L Haywood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathan A PearsonWarwick Research in Nursing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1071-7529
Elizabeth TuttonWarwick Research in Nursing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry.
Jane MartindaleRheumatology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan.
George StricklandRheumatology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan.
Jean ThompsonRheumatology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan.
Jonathan C PackhamAcademic Unit of Population and Lifespan Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
Paul CreamerRheumatology Department, North Bristol NHS Partnership Trust, Bristol, UK.
Kirstie L HaywoodWarwick Research in Nursing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to co-produce and test a potential new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), the Warwick Axial Spondyloarthritis faTigue and Energy questionnaire (WASTEd), providing vital qualitative confirmation of conceptual relevance, clarity and acceptability. Methods: Informed by measurement theory, we collaborated with patient partners throughout a three-stage, iterative process of PROM development. In stage 1, informed by patient interviews, reviews exploring patients' fatigue experiences and existing PROMs of fatigue, an initial measurement framework of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) fatigue and energy and candidate items were defined. In stage 2, the relevance and acceptability of the measurement framework and candidate items were assessed qualitatively by focus group participants. In stage 3, patients participated in pre-testing interviews to assess item comprehensiveness, relevance, acceptability and comprehensibility. Results: Stage 1 informed the development of an initial five-domain measurement framework with 59 candidate items. In stage 2, five patients and seven health-care professionals participated in four focus groups to derive a 40-item model of fatigue and energy. Collaborative engagement with patient research partners supported refinement of questionnaire structure and content further. Pre-testing with ten patients across two interview rounds in stage 3 produced a four-domain, 30-item long-form questionnaire. Conclusion: An active collaboration with patients and health-care professionals has supported the co-production of a potential new PROM of axSpA fatigue, underpinned by strong evidence of face and content validity. The WASTEd extends the assessment of fatigue beyond severity, highlighting the importance of symptom frequency, energy and self-management. Future research will involve psychometric evaluation, supporting item reduction, structural refinement and confirmation of PROM validity.

Indexed as

active collaborationaxial spondyloarthritisco-productionenergyFatiguemeasurementoutcome assessmentpatient-reported outcomesqualitative

Identifiers

PMID35465627
PMCPMC9021732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.