ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Clinical Implication of Adherent Perinephric Fat in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Validation With Video Review.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Renal vascular patterns assessment before robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a video-based correlation with hilum dissection.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Feasibility of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in morbidly obese patients.Translational andrology and urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the impact of adherent perinephric fat (APF) on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Methods: A total of 562 Asian patients with kidney tumors received RAPN and their Mayo adhesive probability (MAP) scores were evaluated. APF was determined intraoperatively and confirmed by a second surgical video review and perioperative data were compared according to the MAP score. The associations of APF with clinical factors were examined using logistic regression analyses. Subgroup (classified according to who performed the surgery) analysis was conducted to assess if the perirenal dissection time is significantly correlated with APF. Results: A total of 118 consecutive patients were classified into two groups according to APF. Patients in the APF group needed significantly longer perirenal fat dissection time ( Conclusions: Preoperative MAP score and perirenal fat dissection time were significantly associated with APF during RAPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.