Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35465308›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental evidence2022

What evidence exists on the links between natural climate solutions and climate change mitigation outcomes in subtropical and tropical terrestrial regions? A systematic map protocol.

Samantha H Cheng, Sebastien Costedoat, Eleanor J Sterling, Catherine Chamberlain, Arundhati Jagadish, Peter Lichtenthal, A Justin Nowakowski, Auset Taylor, Jen Tinsman, Steven W J Canty and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental evidence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Emerging human dimensions research in coastal and nearshore Oceania.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Samantha H ChengCenter for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1799-6310
Sebastien CostedoatMoore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA USA.
Eleanor J SterlingCenter for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY USA.
Catherine ChamberlainMoore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA USA.
Arundhati JagadishMoore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA USA.
Peter LichtenthalColumbia University, New York, NY USA.
A Justin NowakowskiMoore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA USA.
Auset TaylorCenter for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY USA.
Jen TinsmanCenter for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY USA.
Steven W J CantyWorking Land and Seascapes, Conservation Commons, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC USA.
Margaret B HollandDepartment of Geography & Environmental Systems, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD USA.
Kelly W JonesHuman Dimensions of Natural Resources Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO USA.
Morena MillsImperial College London, London, UK.
David Morales-HidalgoForestry Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Starry Sprenkle-HyppoliteCenter for Natural Climate Solutions, Conservation International, Arlington, VA USA.
Meredith WigginsDAI, Washington, DC USA.
Michael B MasciaMoore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA USA.
Carlos L Muñoz BrenesMoore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Natural climate solutions (NCS)-actions to conserve, restore, and modify natural and modified ecosystems to increase carbon storage or avoid greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions-are increasingly regarded as important pathways for climate change mitigation, while contributing to our global conservation efforts, overall planetary resilience, and sustainable development goals. Recently, projections posit that terrestrial-based NCS can potentially capture or avoid the emission of at least 11 Gt (gigatons) of carbon dioxide equivalent a year, or roughly encompassing one third of the emissions reductions needed to meet the Paris Climate Agreement goals by 2030. NCS interventions also purport to provide co-benefits such as improved productivity and livelihoods from sustainable natural resource management, protection of locally and culturally important natural areas, and downstream climate adaptation benefits. Attention on implementing NCS to address climate change across global and national agendas has grown-however, clear understanding of which types of NCS interventions have undergone substantial study versus those that require additional evidence is still lacking. This study aims to conduct a systematic map to collate and describe the current state, distribution, and methods used for evidence on the links between NCS interventions and climate change mitigation outcomes within tropical and sub-tropical terrestrial ecosystems. Results of this study can be used to inform program and policy design and highlight critical knowledge gaps where future evaluation, research, and syntheses are needed. Methods: To develop this systematic map, we will search two bibliographic databases (including 11 indices) and 67 organization websites, backward citation chase from 39 existing evidence syntheses, and solicit information from key informants. All searches will be conducted in English and encompass subtropical and tropical terrestrial ecosystems (forests, grasslands, mangroves, agricultural areas). Search results will be screened at title and abstract, and full text levels, recording both the number of excluded articles and reasons for exclusion. Key meta-data from included articles will be coded and reported in a narrative review that will summarize trends in the evidence base, assess gaps in knowledge, and provide insights for policy, practice, and research. The data from this systematic map will be made open access. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13750-022-00268-w.

Indexed as

Climate changeConservationLand cover and land use changeLand managementMitigationNatural climate solutionsNature-based solutionsRestoration

Identifiers

PMID35465308
PMCPMC9017726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.