Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35465293›Full record

ArticleInternational IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering2021

An Efficient Pipeline for Biophysical Modeling of Neurons.

Nathaniel Opsal, Pete Canfield, Tyler Banks, Satish S Nair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nathaniel OpsalElectrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia MO 65211.
Pete CanfieldElectrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia MO 65211.
Tyler BanksElectrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia MO 65211.
Satish S NairElectrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia MO 65211.

Funding

CRCNS: Optimization of closed-loop control of gamma oscillationsR01MH122023 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI NAIR, SATISH S · 2019 to 2023
$1.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automation of the process of developing biophysical conductance-based neuronal models involves the selection of numerous interacting parameters, making the overall process computationally intensive, complex, and often intractable. A recently reported insight about the possible grouping of currents into distinct biophysical modules associated with specific neurocomputational properties also simplifies the process of automated selection of parameters. The present paper adds a new current module to the previous report to design spike frequency adaptation and bursting characteristics, based on user specifications. We then show how our proposed grouping of currents into modules facilitates the development of a pipeline that automates the biophysical modeling of single neurons that exhibit multiple neurocomputational properties. The software will be made available for public download via our site cyneuro.org.

Identifiers

PMID35465293
PMCPMC9033155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.