ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2022
Evaluation of
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of colistin resistance in clinical isolates ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam, and comparators against Gram-negative pathogens collected in Arabian Gulf countries: SMART 2020-2024.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Resistance: Insights fromMicroorganisms · 2024Review
- Whole Genome Sequencing: Applications in Clinical Bacteriology.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2024Review
- A review of the mechanisms that confer antibiotic resistance in pathotypes ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Review
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities: An Example from Oman.Oman medical journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The treatment options for infections caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria have been limited, especially for infections caused by bacteria that produce carbapenemases and/or ESBLs. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor developed to treat Gram-negative bacteria. Methods: Ceftolozane/tazobactam and 14 comparators (amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, colistin, ertapenem, imipenem, levofloxacin, meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam) were evaluated against Results: Among isolates from Kuwait, susceptibility of Conclusions: Colistin followed by ceftolozane/tazobactam showed the greatest activity against
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.