ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022
The use of base editing technology to characterize single nucleotide variants.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adenine base editor for knockout of proteins: A practical guide from design to analysis with updated MultiEditRbatch.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- High-efficiency TadA cytosine base editors for precise modelling of human disease variants.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Toward optimizing diversifying base editors for high-throughput mutational scanning studies.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- APOBEC Reporter Systems for Evaluating diNucleotide Editing Levels.The CRISPR journal · 2023Article
- BEtarget: A versatile web-based tool to design guide RNAs for base editing in plants.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) represent the most common type of polymorphism in the human genome. However, in many cases the phenotypic impacts of such variants are not well understood. Intriguingly, while some SNVs cause debilitating diseases, other variants in the same gene may have no, or limited, impact. The mechanisms underlying these complex patterns are difficult to study at scale. Additionally, current data and research is mainly focused on European populations, and the mechanisms underlying genetic traits in other populations are poorly studied. Novel technologies may be able to mitigate this disparity and improve the applicability of personalized healthcare to underserved populations. In this review we discuss base editing technologies and their potential to accelerate progress in this field, particularly in combination with single-cell RNA sequencing. We further explore how base editing screens can help link SNVs to distinct disease phenotypes. We then highlight several studies that take advantage of single-cell RNA sequencing and CRISPR screens to emphasize the current limitations and future potential of this technique. Lastly, we consider the use of such approaches to potentially accelerate the study of genetic mechanisms in non-European populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.