Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35465094›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2022

DREADDs in Epilepsy Research: Network-Based Review.

John-Sebastian Mueller, Fabio Cesar Tescarollo, Hai Sun

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Editorial:Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John-Sebastian MuellerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Fabio Cesar TescarolloDepartment of Neurosurgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Hai SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Johnson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy can be interpreted as altered brain rhythms from overexcitation or insufficient inhibition. Chemogenetic tools have revolutionized neuroscience research because they allow "on demand" excitation or inhibition of neurons with high cellular specificity. Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADDs) are the most frequently used chemogenetic techniques in epilepsy research. These engineered muscarinic receptors allow researchers to excite or inhibit targeted neurons with exogenous ligands. As a result, DREADDs have been applied to investigate the underlying cellular and network mechanisms of epilepsy. Here, we review the existing literature that has applied DREADDs to understand the pathophysiology of epilepsy. The aim of this review is to provide a general introduction to DREADDs with a focus on summarizing the current main findings in experimental epilepsy research using these techniques. Furthermore, we explore how DREADDs may be applied therapeutically as highly innovative treatments for epilepsy.

Indexed as

chemogeneticDREADD = designer receptor exclusively activated by designer drugsepilepsyepileptogenesisictogenesispharmaco-geneticseizure

Identifiers

PMID35465094
PMCPMC9021489
OpenAlexW4226081003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.