Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35464939›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Active Surveillance Cultures and Procalcitonin in Combination With Clinical Data to Guide Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy in Hospitalized Medical Patients With Sepsis.

Silvia Spoto, John Daniel Markley, Emanuele Valeriani, Antonio Abbate, Josepmaria Argemi, Roshanak Markley, Marta Fogolari, Luciana Locorriere, Giuseppina Beretta Anguissola, Giulia Battifoglia and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Silvia SpotoDiagnostic and Therapeutic Medicine Department, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
John Daniel MarkleyDivision of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Emanuele ValerianiDiagnostic and Therapeutic Medicine Department, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Antonio AbbateDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Josepmaria ArgemiLiver Unit Clinica Universidad de Navarra Hepatology Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), IdiSNA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Roshanak MarkleyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Marta FogolariUnit of Clinical Laboratory Science, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Luciana LocorriereDiagnostic and Therapeutic Medicine Department, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppina Beretta AnguissolaDiagnostic and Therapeutic Medicine Department, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giulia BattifogliaDiagnostic and Therapeutic Medicine Department, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sebastiano CostantinoDiagnostic and Therapeutic Medicine Department, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Massimo CiccozziUnit of Medical Statistics and Molecular Epidemiology, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
César Bustos GuillénDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Clinica Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Silvia AngelettiUnit of Clinical Laboratory Science, Campus Bio Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Università Campus Bio-Medico · ITVirginia Commonwealth University · USClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESUniversidad de Los Andes, Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The prevalence of colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) has increased over the last decade, reaching levels as high as 23% in certain patient populations. Active surveillance cultures (ASC) represent a valuable tool to identify patients colonized with MDRO to apply preventive measures, reduce transmission, and guide empiric antimicrobial therapy. There is a paucity of data evaluating the impact of admission ASCs to predict future infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concordance between ASCs results and the development of clinical infection by the same microorganism identified in the surveillance swab ("swab-related infection"), in hospitalized septic patients, and to evaluate the presence of specific risk factors associated with the development of a swab-related infection. Methods: All adults admitted to the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Medicine Department of the University Hospital Campus Bio-Medico of Rome with a diagnosis of infection or any other medical reason with admission surveillance swabs (rectal or nasal) between January 2018 and February 2021 were included in the study. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients that developed infections with concordant MDROs identified on ASC, and the risk factors for swab-related infection. Secondary outcomes were need of intensive care unit transfer, length of stay, sepsis or septic shock development, and all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 528 patients were included in the study, of which 97 (18.3%) had a positive surveillance swab. Among patients with positive surveillance swabs, 18 (18.5%) developed an infection with the same microorganism recovered from the swab, 57 (58.8%) developed an infection with a different microorganism than that recovered from the surveillance swab, and 22 (22.7%) did not develop an infection during hospitalization. The number of colonized sites, an interventional procedure within the previous 3 months, a Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) score ≥ 2, and a quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (q-SOFA) score ≥ 2 were associated with a significantly higher risk of developing a swab-related infection. SIRS and q-SOFA scores ≥ 2 and procalcitonin ≥ 0.43 ng/ml help for identifying patients with a swab-related infection. Conclusion: Patients with positive surveillance swabs were at increased risk for development of infections by the same MDRO identified in surveillance swabs (swab-related infection). This study is the first to show that the positivity of surveillance swabs, in combination with anamnestic data, PCT values, and SIRS or q-SOFA scores, serves as a valuable tool to help clinicians predict patients at higher risk for swab-related infection development and guide the administration of appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy in septic patients.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistance (AMR)MDRO colonizationnasal and rectal surveillance swabprocalcitoninquick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA)sepsisSequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)

Identifiers

PMID35464939
PMCPMC9023116
OpenAlexW4226064665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.