SynthesisFrontiers in surgery2021
Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Transoral Robotic Surgery and Endoscopic Laryngopharyngeal Surgery for Hypopharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Costs of resolving a ureteral or kidney stone episode worldwide: a systematic review.International urology and nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and (chemo)radiotherapy in locoregionally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective cohort study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparison of Transoral Robotic Surgery and Endoscopic Laryngopharyngeal Surgery for Hypopharyngeal and Supraglottic Laryngeal Cancers.DEN open · 2026Article
- [Current application and future development trends of robotic head and neck surgery].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025Review
- [Indications and early experience with transoral robotic surgery].Magyar onkologia · 2024Article
- Robotic Surgery for Head and Neck Tumors: What are the Current Applications?Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Article
- Therapeutic effect on pyriform sinus carcinoma resectionFrontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Nomogram Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab in Locally Advanced Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-facialeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Hypopharyngeal carcinoma (HPC) is a head and neck carcinoma with poor prognosis. Traditional laryngopharyngectomy offered promising oncological outcomes at the cost of functional outcomes. The recent advent in transoral robotic surgery (TORS), an organ-preserving surgery, has opened up new perspectives in the treatment for HPC. Here, we evaluate minimally invasive organ preservation surgery [TORS and endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery (ELPS)] for HPC in terms of feasibility and oncological and functional outcomes. Methods: This is a systematic review. Six databases [CUHK Full-Text Journals, Embase 1910 to 2021, Ovid Emcare, Ovid MEDLINE (R), CINAHL, PubMed] were searched for articles and primary studies for TORS and ELPS for HPC. Screening was completed using predefined inclusion or exclusion criteria. Results: A total of 8 studies on TORS and 3 studies on ELPS were eventually chosen after full-text review. For studies on TORS, 61.3% of patients (84 out of 137) still survived at the last follow-up with a mean follow-up time of 23.20 months (range: 12.8-37.21 months). Severe intraoperative and postoperative complications have not been reported. No cases of TORS required a conversion to open surgery. Swallowing function was optimal postoperatively with only 6 patients eventually required a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for feeding. Disease-specific survival was taken as the parameter for the measurement of oncological outcomes. A total of 2 studies reported a disease-specific survival of 100% within their follow-up period of 1 and 1.5 years, respectively. Another 2 studies reported a 2-year DSS of 89 and 98%, respectively. A 5-year DSS of 100% in early stage and 74% in late stage were achieved in one study. Another study also reported a 5-year DSS of 91.7%. For studies of ELPS, a 5- and 3-year disease-specific survival of 100% were achieved in 2 studies. Patients who underwent ELPS had good postoperative swallowing function with no PEG placement. There were also no other fatal complications. Conclusions: Both TORS and ELPS for HPC provide satisfactory long-term oncological and functional outcomes improving postoperative quality of life of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.