ArticleTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease2022
SCORE2
Article in Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel approach to cardiovascular events in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: risk factor assessment and treatment analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
- Modern therapy of patients with lupus erythematosus must include appropriate management of their heightened rates of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events: a literature update.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluating Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among Healthcare Professionals in Iran.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Personalizing cardiovascular risk prediction for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2024Article
- Managing Cardiovascular Risk in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Considerations for the Clinician.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Recently, the Systematic Coronary Risk Assessment (SCORE), a well-known CV risk algorithm, has been updated to a new predictive model (SCORE2). This new algorithm improves the identification of individuals at high risk of developing CV disease across Europe. Since carotid atherosclerosis is a predictor of future CV events and CV death, our objective was to compare the predictive capacity of SCORE2 Methods: Two hundred and thirty-five individuals over 40 years of age diagnosed with SLE were consecutively recruited in this cross-sectional study. SCORE and SCORE2 were calculated. The relationship of SCORE and SCORE2 with each other, and with the presence of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis (both carotid plaque and carotid intima media thickness -cIMT-), was studied. Results: SCORE2 and SCORE did not correlate with each other (Spearman's Rho = 0.125, Conclusion: In SLE patients, the ability of SCORE2 to predict the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis is higher than that of SCORE. According to our results, SCORE2, rather than SCORE, should be used in the CV risk stratification of patients with SLE. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.