Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35464776›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2022

Respiratory Interventions for Preterm Infants in LMICs: A Prospective Study From Cape Town, South Africa.

Ilse Lategan, Caris Price, Natasha Raygaan Rhoda, Heather J Zar, Lloyd Tooke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Moving on from clinical animal-derived surfactants to peptide-based synthetic pulmonary surfactant.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ilse LateganDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Caris PriceDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Natasha Raygaan RhodaDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Heather J ZarDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lloyd TookeDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
University of Cape Town · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preterm birth is a global public health issue and complications of preterm birth result in the death of approximately 1 million infants each year, 99% of which are in low-and-middle income countries (LMIC). Although respiratory interventions such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and surfactant have been shown to improve the outcomes of preterm infants with respiratory distress, they are not readily available in low-resourced areas. The aim of this study was to report the respiratory support needs and outcomes of preterm infants in a low-resourced setting, and to estimate the impact of a lack of access to these interventions on neonatal mortality. Methods: We conducted a six-month prospective observational study on preterm infants <1,801 g admitted at Groote Schuur Hospital and Mowbray Maternity Hospital neonatal units in Cape Town, South Africa. We extrapolated results from the study to model the potential outcomes of these infants in the absence of these interventions. Results: Five hundred and fifty-two infants (552) <1,801 g were admitted. Three hundred (54.3%) infants received CPAP, and this was the initial respiratory intervention for most cases of respiratory distress syndrome. Surfactant was given to 100 (18.1%) infants and a less invasive method was the most common method of administration. Invasive mechanical ventilation was offered to 105 (19%) infants, of which only 57 (54.2%) survived until discharge from hospital. The overall mortality of the cohort was 14.1% and the hypothetical removal of invasive mechanical ventilation, surfactant and CPAP would result in an additional 157 deaths and increase the overall mortality to 42.5%. A lack of CPAP availability would have the largest impact on mortality and result in the largest number of additional deaths (109). Conclusion: This study highlights the effect that access to key respiratory interventions has on preterm outcomes in LMICs. CPAP has the largest impact on neonatal mortality and improving its coverage should be the primary goal for low-resourced areas to save newborn lives.

Indexed as

continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)interventionsinvasive mechanical ventilationlow-and-middle income countries (LMIC)preterm (birth)respiratoryrespiratory distress syndrome (RDS)surfactant

Identifiers

PMID35464776
PMCPMC9019119
OpenAlexW4225784266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.