Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35464748›Full record

ArticleBiochemia medica2022

An analysis of the vitamin D overtesting in a tertiary healthcare centre.

Merica Aralica, Vesna Šupak Smolčić, Tamara Turk Wensveen, Snježana Hrabrić Vlah, Mihael Selar, Lidija Bilić Zulle

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemia medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Merica AralicaClinical Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Vesna Šupak SmolčićClinical Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Tamara Turk WensveenCenter for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Cardiometabolism, Thallassotherapia, Opatija, Croatia.
Snježana Hrabrić VlahClinical Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Mihael SelarDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital Pula, Pula, Croatia.
Lidija Bilić ZulleClinical Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
University of Rijeka · HRUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRJuraj Dobrila University of Pula · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vitamin D testing is excessively used in clinical practice, despite of the clinical guidelines statements against population screening for vitamin D deficiency. This study aimed to assess an annual number of performed 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) tests that were unsupported by the national guidelines for prevention, detection and therapy of vitamin D deficiency in adults and to calculate associated financial burden for the publicly funded healthcare. Materials and methods: A representative sample of requested 25(OH)D tests in 2018 (N = 474) was formed after selection and randomisation of data set (N = 5298) collected from the laboratory information system database of the Clinical Department for Laboratory Diagnostics, the Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka. Records were classified in two groups depending on associated medical condition(s) according to the national guidelines. An annual cost of the total and group specific vitamin D testing was calculated on the base of a single test price reimbursed by the Croatian Healthcare Insurance Fund (CHIF). Results: Medical conditions with high-risk for vitamin D deficiency were detected in 43% (206/474) of vitamin D requests (group 1). Conditions not associated with vitamin D deficiency were detected in 57% (268/474) requests (group 2). A total cost of 25(OH)D testing for the CHIF was 58,729.50 EUR (25,523.79 EUR in the group 1 and 33,205.71 EUR in the group 2). Conclusions: More than half of all 25(OH)D tests performed in the clinical laboratory represent avoidable cost for the public healthcare. Prevention of population screening by vitamin D testing is needed.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory Information SystemsVitamin D DeficiencyAdultHumansTertiary Care CentersTertiary Health CareVitamin DVitamin D25(OH) Dfinancial burdenguidelineovertestingvitamin D testing

Identifiers

PMID35464748
PMCPMC8996321
OpenAlexW4223595576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.