Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35464736›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022

"Double Barrel" Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis: A Useful Addition to a Supermicrosurgeon's Repertoire.

Zulqarnain Masoodi, Johannes Steinbacher, Ines E Tinhofer, Manon Czedik-Eysenberg, Balazs Mohos, Julia Roka-Palkovits, Nina Huettinger, Stefan Meng, Chieh-Han John Tzou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Overlapping lockup lymphaticovenous anastomosis: A useful addition to supermicrosurgery.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024
    Article
  3. Imaging Modalities for Evaluating Lymphedema.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zulqarnain MasoodiPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of Divine Savior, Vienna, Austria.
Johannes SteinbacherPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of Divine Savior, Vienna, Austria.
Ines E TinhoferPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of Divine Savior, Vienna, Austria.
Manon Czedik-EysenbergPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of Divine Savior, Vienna, Austria.
Balazs MohosPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of Divine Savior, Vienna, Austria.
Julia Roka-PalkovitsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of Divine Savior, Vienna, Austria.
Nina HuettingerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of Divine Savior, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan MengDepartment of Radiology, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Chieh-Han John TzouPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hospital of Divine Savior, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATSigmund Freud University Vienna · ATVeszprémi Érseki Hittudományi Fõiskola · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsurgical amelioration of lymphedema has gained much traction in recent years and is now an established modality of treatment for this condition. Despite the development of many newer techniques, lymphaticovenous anastomosis still remains the most frequently carried out microsurgical procedure for lymphedema. One of the most common hurdles faced by lymphatic surgeons while carrying out a lymphaticovenous anastomosis is a mismatch in sizes of the vein and the lymphatic vessels. Method: This article describes a novel but simple "double barrel" technique, developed by the authors for carrying out lymphaticovenous anastomosis in cases of such lymphaticovenous mismatch. Seventeen double barrel anastomoses were carried out in 12 lymphedema patients, over a 4-year period from 2017 to 2021. Results: The overall success rate was 100%, as measured by clinical observation (venous washout, lymphatic backflow), the Acland vessel strip test, and by means of intraoperative ICG lymphography. Mild leakage was observed in four cases after release of the venous clamp and was corrected by application of additional sutures. Conclusions: The double barrel technique is a safe and effective tool that can be employed to deal with the bane of size mismatch, a persistent problem faced by lymphedema surgeons universally. Although we do not advocate it as a total replacement for other techniques, it can be a worthy addition to the present set of available options. In specific scenarios of mismatch with additional challenges, the double barrel technique has the potential to be considered as

Identifiers

PMID35464736
PMCPMC9018996
OpenAlexW4224256941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.