Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35464702›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Comparison of color accuracy and picture quality of digital SLR, point and shoot and mobile cameras used for dental intraoral photography - A pilot study.

Rishi Saincher, Santhosh Kumar, Pratibha Gopalkrishna, M Maithri, Pradeep Sherigar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Photo-Based Color Analysis in Restorative Dentistry: The Role of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessment of gingival characteristics by professional versus smartphone imaging.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rishi SaincherManipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576104, Udupi, Karnataka, India.
Santhosh KumarDepartment of Periodontology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576104, Udupi, Karnataka, India.
Pratibha GopalkrishnaDepartment of Periodontology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576104, Udupi, Karnataka, India.
M MaithriDepartment of Mechatronics, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576104, Udupi, Karnataka, India.
Pradeep SherigarDepartment of Prosthodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal - 576104, Udupi, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare the picture quality and color accuracy of three cameras, namely, Point and shoot, DSLR and mobile cameras, and determine the most suitable camera for dental photography (intra-orally and for casts). A computer program, namely, NRM (No-Reference matrix BRISQUE), was used to evaluate the quality of the photos taken by three cameras. Further, color accuracy was determined by computation of total color difference (

Indexed as

AlgorithmsColor perceptionComputer programDental photographyMobile phone

Identifiers

PMID35464702
PMCPMC9026587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.