Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35464605›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2022

Impact of Change in Allocation Score Methodology on Post Kidney Transplant Average Length of Stay.

Hanadi Y Hamadi, Hani M Wadei, Jing Xu, Dayana Martinez, Aaron Spaulding, Shehzad K Niazi, Tambi Jarmi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hanadi Y HamadiDepartment of Health Administration, Brooks College of Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-7267
Hani M WadeiDepartment of Transplant, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4886-0897
Jing XuDepartment of Health Administration, Brooks College of Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5168-3388
Dayana MartinezDepartment of Health Administration, Brooks College of Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Aaron SpauldingDivision of Health Care Delivery Research, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9727-6756
Shehzad K NiaziDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9925-331X
Tambi JarmiDepartment of Transplant, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9973-0470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In December 2014, a new Kidney Allocation System (KAS) was implemented nationwide to improve access and quality of care to historically disadvantaged patients. However, no study to date has examined the relationship between the KAS and potential changes in hospital length of stay (LOS). This study aimed to examine the relationship between the KAS implemented in December 2014 and potential changes in hospital LOS. Methods: We used data from the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration on kidney transplant surgeries completed between 2011 and 2018. A cross-sectional cohort study design included seven hospitals that performed kidney transplants for the duration of the study. A propensity score matching approach was used to examine the relationship between KAS and LOS. All acute general medical and surgical hospitals in Florida that performed kidney transplant surgery were included in the analysis. Results: We included 7,795 patients, 6,119 discharged to home, and 1,676 discharged to home with home health services after transplant. The average LOS prior to KAS was 6.52 days and 6.08 days post KAS. Propensity matched results show that patients transferred to home experienced a decrease in the LOS (coefficient (β) = -0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.95, -0.42) after the new allocation score was implemented. Similarly, patients transferred to home with home health experienced a decrease in the LOS (β = -1.90; 95% CI: -2.69, -1.11) after the new allocation was implemented. Conclusion: In conclusion, results indicate that KAS implementation did not add a burden on the health system by increasing LOS when considering patients with similar characteristics before and after KAS implementation. KAS is an important policy change that appears to not negatively affect the LOS when sicker patients could receive a kidney transplant. Our findings improve our understanding of the KAS policy and its influence on the health system.

Indexed as

HospitalsInpatient stayKidney transplantationOrgan procurementPatient dischargePropensity score

Identifiers

PMID35464605
PMCPMC8993433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.