ArticleCureus2022
Treatment Strategy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Endoscopic Intramural Metastasis.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conversion surgery after chemoimmunotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with gastric intramural metastasis: a case report and the literature review.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Mucosal esophageal carcinoma following endoscopic submucosal dissection with giant gastric metastasis: A case report and review of literature.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntramural metastasis (IM) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is sometimes found, and the prognosis of ESCC patients with pathologically diagnosed IM is known to be dismal. However, there are few reports on ESCC patients with clinically diagnosed IM.
methodsThis study assessed 2,772 ESCC patients who underwent endoscopy for initial evaluation. Among them, 85 patients (3.1%) were diagnosed with endoscopic IM. In this study, we investigated these patients' characteristics, survival among the groups stratified by the treatment modalities, and survival predictors.
resultsOf 85 patients, 76 (89.4%) had T3 or T4 tumors, 73 (85.9%) had nodal metastases, and 36 (42.4%) had M1 diseases. Curative-intent treatment could be given to 63 patients (74.1%) with a median survival time (MST) of 15.6 months (95% CI: 10.7-20.4). As initial treatment, upfront surgery (US), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) using cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) were given to 17 (27.0%), 27 (42.9%), 2 (3.2%), and 17 patients (27.0%), respectively. dCRT was preferred for T4 tumors compared with US or NAC (P = 0.02). The MST of US and NAC patients was 19.3 (95% CI: 12.9-25.6) and 23.4 months (95% CI: 9.4-37.4), respectively. No significant difference was noted between US and NAC patients (P= 0.89).
conclusionThe prognosis of ESCC patients with endoscopic IM is poor even if curative-intent treatment is done. Moreover, no significant survival benefit of NAC with CF for these patients was observed when compared with US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.