ArticleCureus2022
A Rare Case of an Adrenal Mass Proved to Be a Benign Cellular Schwannoma.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidental detection of adrenal schwannoma: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adrenal schwannomas are extremely uncommon tumors. We report the case of a 39-year-old male with a right adrenal mass. Laboratory tests were normal and radiological exams revealed the adrenal tumor. Open surgical adrenalectomy was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. Microscopy and immunohistochemistry revealed a cellular schwannoma. Adrenal schwannomas are rare tumors, very difficult to diagnose in preoperative evaluation. Surgical excision of the tumor, histological and immunohistochemical examination of the specimen provide a definitive diagnosis. Prognosis is generally very good. Recurrence rates are related to positive surgical margins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.