Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35464517›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Diagnosing Frailty in Primary Care Practice.

Manoj R Somagutta, Utkarsha Uday, Narayana R Bathula, Siva Pendyala, Ashwini Mahadevaiah, Molly S Jain, Greta Mahmutaj, Mohamed Gad, Jennifer Jean Baptiste

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Multiple Myeloma in 2023 Ways: From Trials to Real Life.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Manoj R SomaguttaDepartment of Medicine and Research, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, CUW.
Utkarsha UdayDepartment of Medicine, West Bengal University of Health Sciences, Kolkata, IND.
Narayana R BathulaDepartment of Medicine and Research, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, CUW.
Siva PendyalaDepartment of Medicine and Research, Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, CUW.
Ashwini MahadevaiahDepartment of Medicine, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysore, IND.
Molly S JainDepartment of Medicine, Saint James School of Medicine, Windsor, CAN.
Greta MahmutajDepartment of Medicine, University of Medicine Tirana, Tirana, ALB.
Mohamed GadDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD.
Jennifer Jean BaptisteDepartment of Medicine, Saint James School of Medicine, Park Ridge, USA.
Avalon University School of Medicine · CWCalifornia Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · USJSS Academy of Higher Education and Research · INUniversity of Medicine Tirana · ALUniversity of Tirana · AL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty is a complex age-related clinical condition with increased vulnerability to negative health outcomes that manifest as a multidimensional syndrome and hence, a challenge to identify at-risk populations. We aim to summarize the implementation of strategies to diagnose fragility in family practice using current evidence. We searched the PubMed and Google Scholar databases for relevant articles, using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms "Frailty," "Frailty Scales," and "Primary Health Care." All original research articles on the elderly population (65 years of age or older) published in English and the last five years were included. Frailty diagnosis has resulted in positive outcomes in the overall literature. Recent hospital admission may indicate a health problem that can end up in a negative outcome and has been often described as associated with frailty. It was also shown to affect the intensive care units' mortality, in-hospital mortality, and long-term mortality. However, multiple screening instruments have been developed and validated to improve feasibility in clinical practice. The frequent lack of agreement between frailty instruments has slowed the broad implementation of these tools. The impacts of frailty warrant an upstream, proactive, holistic, interprofessional primary care approach to its identification, assessment, and management. It is a preventable disorder; identifying elderly patients at risk in primary care can help shape appropriate care processes tailored to their needs. This literature review aims to demonstrate the importance and strategies in identifying frailty in primary care settings and assess its impact on several outcomes.

Indexed as

agingdisabilityelderlyfamily practicefragilityfrailtygeriatricscreening tools

Identifiers

PMID35464517
PMCPMC9015073
OpenAlexW4220780122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.