ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2022
Postoperative improvement in leg length discrepancy in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis differs between right and left legs.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiographic characterization and predictive modeling of functional scoliosis secondary to leg length discrepancy in adolescents.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients, leg length discrepancies (LLDs) often occur to compensate for scoliosis. However, there have been no reports on the LLD changes after corrective surgery for AIS. This study aimed to clarify the difference of LLD changes after corrective surgery for AIS by classifying LLD based on the shortened side. Methods: We analyzed preoperative and postoperative radiographs of 94 consecutive AIS patients who underwent posterior corrective surgery between 2012 and 2018. The patients enrolled were divided into three groups according to the presence of preoperative LLD of more than 5 mm and the LLD side: the left leg shortened group (L group), the non-LLD group (N group), and the right leg shortened group (R group). The three groups were compared with regard to age, sex, Lenke classification, Risser grade, fused levels, and radiographic parameters before surgery and at 6-month follow-up (thoracic Cobb angle, lumbar Cobb angle, L4 tilt, coronal balance, T1 tilt, and LLD). Results: The L, N, and R groups included 23 (24%), 60 (64%), and 11 patients (12%), respectively. The demographics and radiographic parameters were not significantly different among the groups except for preoperative L4 tilt. In the L group only, the LLD decreased from 7.9 ± 2.2 mm to 5.7 ± 3.7 mm ( Conclusions: The postoperative improvement of LLD in AIS patients differed between the left and right sides. Different pathologies may contribute to the LLD on the left and right sides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.