Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35464394›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Design and Evaluation of TIM-3-CD28 Checkpoint Fusion Proteins to Improve Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell Function.

Franziska Blaeschke, Eva Ortner, Dana Stenger, Jasmin Mahdawi, Antonia Apfelbeck, Nicola Habjan, Tanja Weißer, Theresa Kaeuferle, Semjon Willier, Sebastian Kobold and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. TIM-3 in AML: pathogenic roles and therapeutic targetability.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Targeting LAG-3, TIM-3, and TIGIT for cancer immunotherapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Franziska BlaeschkeDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Eva OrtnerDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Dana StengerDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Jasmin MahdawiDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Antonia ApfelbeckDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Nicola HabjanDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Tanja WeißerDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Theresa KaeuferleDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Semjon WillierDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Sebastian KoboldGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany.
Tobias FeuchtingerDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEGerman Center for Infection Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic targeting of inhibitory checkpoint molecules in combination with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells is currently investigated in a variety of clinical studies for treatment of hematologic and solid malignancies. However, the impact of co-inhibitory axes and their therapeutic implication remains understudied for the majority of acute leukemias due to their low immunogenicity/mutational load. The inhibitory exhaustion molecule TIM-3 is an important marker for the interaction of T cells with leukemic cells. Moreover, inhibitory signals from malignant cells could be transformed into stimulatory signals by synthetic fusion molecules with extracellular inhibitory receptors fused to an intracellular stimulatory domain. Here, we designed a variety of different TIM-3-CD28 fusion proteins to turn inhibitory signals derived by TIM-3 engagement into T-cell activation through CD28. In the absence of anti-CD19 CAR, two TIM-3-CD28 fusion receptors with large parts of CD28 showed strongest responses in terms of cytokine secretion and proliferation upon stimulation with anti-CD3 antibodies compared to controls. We then combined these two novel TIM-3-CD28 fusion proteins with first- and second-generation anti-CD19 CAR T cells and found that the fusion receptor can increase proliferation, activation, and cytotoxic capacity of conventional anti-CD19 CAR T cells. These additionally armed CAR T cells showed excellent effector function. In terms of safety considerations, the fusion receptors showed exclusively increased cytokine release, when the CAR target CD19 was present. We conclude that combining checkpoint fusion proteins with anti-CD19 CARs has the potential to increase T-cell proliferation capacity with the intention to overcome inhibitory signals during the response against malignant cells.

Indexed as

CD28 AntigensImmunotherapy, AdoptiveAntigens, CD19CytokinesHepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2T-LymphocytesAntigens, CD19CD28 AntigensCytokinesHepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)CAR T cellsCD19CD28checkpoint fusion proteinspediatric leukemiaTIM-3

Identifiers

PMID35464394
PMCPMC9018974
OpenAlexW4225659260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.