Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35464311›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Reduces Neuroinflammation Through Microglia Polarization Regulation to Improve Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury.

Hui Chen, Zhou Feng, Lingxia Min, Weiwei Deng, Mingliang Tan, Jian Hong, Qiuwen Gong, Dongyun Zhang, Hongliang Liu, Jingming Hou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The brain and heart-axis in neurodegeneration and cardiovascular disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hui ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhou FengDepartment of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Lingxia MinDepartment of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Weiwei DengDepartment of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Mingliang TanDepartment of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jian HongDepartment of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Qiuwen GongDepartment of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Dongyun ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Hongliang LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jingming HouDepartment of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Southwest Hospital · CNArmy Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating disease that lacks effective treatment. Interestingly, recent studies indicated that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), neuromodulation that is widely used in a variety of central nervous system (CNS) diseases, improved motor function recovery after SCI. But the exact underlying mechanism of how VNS ameliorates SCI is unclear. This study aimed to confirm the efficacy and further explore the potential therapeutic mechanism of VNS in SCI. Method: A T10 spinal cord compression model was established in adult female Sprague-Dawley rats. Then the stimulation electrode was placed in the left cervical vagus nerve (forming Sham-VNS, VNS, and VNS-MLA groups). Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) behavioral scores and Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) analysis were used to detect motor function. A combination of histological and molecular methods was used to clarify the relevant mechanism. Results: Compared with the Sham-VNS group, the VNS group exhibited better functional recovery, reduced scar formation (both glial and fibrotic scars), tissue damage, and dark neurons, but these beneficial effects of VNS were diminished after alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAchR) blockade. Specifically, VNS inhibited the pro-inflammatory factors TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 and increased the expression of the anti-inflammatory factors IL-10. Furthermore, we found that VNS promotes the shift of M1-polarized Iba-1 Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that VNS promotes microglial M2 polarization through upregulating α7nAChR to reduce neuroinflammation, thus improving motor function recovery after SCI. These findings indicate VNS might be a promising neuromodulation strategy for SCI.

Indexed as

alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptorcholinergic anti-inflammatory pathwaymicroglial polarizationneuroinflammationspinal cord injuryvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35464311
PMCPMC9022634
OpenAlexW4225624940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.