ArticleFood science and biotechnology2022
In silico prediction models for thyroid peroxidase inhibitors and their application to synthetic flavors.
Article in Food science and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perspective on applicability of data-driven machine learning computational new approach methodologies for hazard identification in chemicals risk assessment.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systematic toxicity tests are often waived for the synthetic flavors as they are added in a very small amount in foods. However, their safety for some endpoints such as endocrine disruption should be concerned as they are likely to be active in low levels. In this case, structure-activity-relationship (SAR) models are good alternatives. In this study, therefore, binary, ternary, and quaternary prediction models were designed using simple or complex machine-learning methods. Overall, hard-voting classifiers outperformed other methods. The test scores for the best binary, ternary, and quaternary models were 0.6635, 0.5083, and 0.5217, respectively. Along with model development, some substructures including primary aromatic amine, (enol)ether, phenol, heterocyclic sulfur, and heterocyclic nitrogen, dominantly occurred in the most highly active compounds. The best predicting models were applied to synthetic flavors, and 22 agents appeared to have a strong inhibitory potential towards TPO activities. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10068-022-01041-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.