ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2022
Audio texture analysis of COVID-19 cough, breath, and speech sounds.
Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cough biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring of respiratory disease: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Pooled it
- Applied Machine Learning Techniques to Diagnose Voice-Affecting Conditions and Disorders: Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Screening speech disorders in progressive neurological diseases via long-term average spectrum.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- Advanced COVID-19 detection using cough signals with space reconstruction and 3D deep convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cough duration, energy and sound frequency in COVID-19 patients: the spectral analysis results.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening using time-frequency features of self-recorded respiratory sounds.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Automatic detection and prediction of COVID-19 in cough audio signals using coronavirus herd immunity optimizer algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Towards Multimodal Equipment to Help in the Diagnosis of COVID-19 Using Machine Learning Algorithms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Electrical aspects of skin as a pathway to engineering skin devices.APL bioengineering · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) first appeared at the end of December 2019 and is still spreading in most countries. To diagnose COVID-19 using reverse transcription - Polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), one has to go to a dedicated center, which requires significant cost and human resources. Hence, there is a requirement for a remote monitoring tool that can perform the preliminary screening of COVID-19. In this paper, we propose that a detailed audio texture analysis of COVID-19 sounds may help in performing the initial screening of COVID-19. The texture analysis is done on three different signal modalities of COVID-19, i.e. cough, breath, and speech signals. In this work, we have used 1141 samples of cough signals, 392 samples of breath signals, and 893 samples of speech signals. To analyze the audio textural behavior of COVID-19 sounds, the local binary patterns LBP) and Haralick's features were extracted from the spectrogram of the signals. The textural analysis on cough and breath sounds was done on the following 5 classes for the first time: COVID-19 positive with cough, COVID-19 positive without cough, healthy person with cough, healthy person without cough, and an asthmatic cough. For speech sounds there were only two classes: COVID-19 positive, and COVID-19 negative. During experiments, 71.7% of the cough samples and 72.2% of breath samples were classified into 5 classes. Also, 79.7% of speech samples are classified into 2 classes. The highest accuracy rate of 98.9% was obtained when binary classification between COVID-19 cough and non-COVID-19 cough was done.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.