Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35464121›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2022

A Comparative Study of Data-Driven Models for Travel Destination Characterization.

Linus W Dietz, Mete Sertkan, Saadi Myftija, Sameera Thimbiri Palage, Julia Neidhardt, Wolfgang Wörndl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Linus W DietzDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Mete SertkanResearch Unit E-Commerce, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Saadi MyftijaDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Sameera Thimbiri PalageDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Julia NeidhardtResearch Unit E-Commerce, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang WörndlDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing items for content-based recommender systems is a challenging task in complex domains such as travel and tourism. In the case of destination recommendation, no feature set can be readily used as a similarity ground truth, which makes it hard to evaluate the quality of destination characterization approaches. Furthermore, the process should scale well for many items, be cost-efficient, and most importantly correct. To evaluate which data sources are most suitable, we investigate 18 characterization methods that fall into three categories: venue data, textual data, and factual data. We make these data models comparable using rank agreement metrics and reveal which data sources capture similar underlying concepts. To support choosing more suitable data models, we capture a desired concept using an expert survey and evaluate our characterization methods toward it. We find that the textual models to characterize cities perform best overall, with data models based on factual and venue data being less competitive. However, we show that data models with explicit features can be optimized by learning weights for their features.

Indexed as

content-based filteringdata miningdestination characterizationexpert evaluationrank agreement metricsrecommender systems

Identifiers

PMID35464121
PMCPMC9022027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.